Valero v. State

Decision Date17 February 1981
Docket NumberNo. 80-1478,80-1478
Citation393 So.2d 1197
PartiesMargarita Colon VALERO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Gino P. Negretti, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant's request for oral argument, made not in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, is denied. Cf. Quince v. State, 91 So.2d 632 (Fla.1957); Haines v. State, 113 So.2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959) (denying requests for oral argument not made in a separate document, but incorporated in the brief, under former Florida Supreme Court Rule 40 and Florida Appellate Rule 3.10(a), respectively). After independently examining the briefs and record herein, we have determined that oral argument would serve no useful purpose, see, e. g., Williams v. State, 177 So.2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), and, in the exercise of our discretion, decline to require it. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.320.

The judgments of convictions are affirmed. The evidence is more than sufficient to support the convictions. The constitutionality of Section 775.082, Florida Statutes (1979), in the face of the exact contention made by Valero here, namely, that it imposes cruel and unusual punishment, is well settled. McArthur v. State, 351 So.2d 972 (Fla.1977); Banks v. State, 342 So.2d 469 (Fla.1976); O'Donnell v. State, 326 So.2d 4 (Fla.1975). Valero's claim that her trial counsel was ineffective cannot properly be raised for the first time on direct appeal and is a matter to be presented to the trial court under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); Jones v. State, 384 So.2d 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Randall v. State, 346 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Save Brickell Ave., Inc. v. City of Miami
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 17, 1981
    ...393 So.2d 1197 ... SAVE BRICKELL AVENUE, INC., a Corporation Not for Profit under the Laws of the State of Florida, etc., et al., Petitioners, ... The CITY OF MIAMI, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, etc., et al., Respondents ... No. 80-2046 ... ...
  • McMillian v. State, 80-808
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 1, 1981
    ...issue of ineffective assistance of counsel is not properly raised on appeal. State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); Valero v. State, 393 So.2d 1197 (Fla.3d DCA, 1981). OTT, Acting C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., ...
  • Edgecombe v. State, AN-433
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 3, 1983
    ...judgment and sentence. We cannot consider on this appeal any allegations regarding ineffective assistance of counsel. Valero v. State, 393 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT