Valle v. State, 3D08-2187.

Decision Date23 October 2008
Docket NumberNo. 3D08-2187.,3D08-2187.
Citation994 So.2d 425
PartiesCarlos DEL VALLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Heidi Milan Caballero, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gonzales v. State, 909 So.2d 960, 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("If the probationer's defense is inability to pay, `it is incumbent upon the probationer or offender to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he or she does not have the present resources available to pay restitution or the cost of supervision despite sufficient bona fide efforts legally to acquire the resources to do so.' § 948.06(5), Fla. Stat. (2004)").

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • CHANDLER v. The State of Fla., 3D09-778.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 18 Agosto 2010
    ...she was financially unable to meet her restitution obligation. Adhering to binding precedent in this district, see Del Valle v. State, 994 So.2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), we find the statute is constitutional and lawfully places the burden upon Ms. Chandler to prove by clear and convincing ev......
  • Feliciano v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 24 Octubre 2008

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT