Van Wilson v. State, ED 98578.

Decision Date13 August 2013
Docket NumberNo. ED 98578.,ED 98578.
Citation404 S.W.3d 901
PartiesVan WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Robert H. Dierker, Jr., Judge.

Roxanna A. Mason, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jennifer A. Rodewald, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and MAURA B. McSHANE, Sp.J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Van Wilson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing and denying his motion to quash the amended motion and to disqualify appointed counsel. We find the motion court did not err in denying Wilson's motions. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT