Vanderwolk v. Matthaei
Decision Date | 29 April 1914 |
Docket Number | (No. 5273.) |
Citation | 167 S.W. 304 |
Parties | VANDERWOLK et al. v. MATTHAEI. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Austin County; Frank S. Roberts, Judge.
Action by Elizabeth Jenke Vanderwolk and others against W. A. Matthaei. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
J. E. Edmundson, of Bellville, and John T. Duncan, of La Grange, for appellants. Searcy & Botts, of Brenham, and Johnson, Matthaei & Thompson, of Bellville, for appellee.
Elizabeth Jenke Vanderwolk and Charles J. Jenke, a minor suing by his father, Chas. A. Jenke, as next friend, on April 5, 1913, sued W. A. Matthaei in trespass to try title, seeking to recover two tracts of land in Austin county, one containing 75 acres, the other 33 acres. Defendant answered by general denial, plea of not guilty; then pleaded statutes of limitation of three, five and ten years in bar of plaintiffs' suit; and also pleaded that he had made improvements in good faith, setting out the title upon which he based said claim. Plaintiffs pleaded their minority in reply to the pleas of limitation, denied the allegations of the answer, and attacked the title under which defendant claims, alleging in detail the various defects claimed by them to exist in defendant's title.
Judgment was rendered for defendant, and findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed.
The findings of fact read as follows:
Our conclusions upon the law of the case are:
1. That plaintiffs and defendant claim title from a common source, to wit, Mrs. A. Louise Jenke. The deed from her stepmother, Louise Nolte, to Chas. A. Jenke conveyed no title, and, besides, carries on its face notice that the land is the separate property of Mrs. A. Louise Jenke. There is no merit in the contention that the latter could pass title to her husband by permitting, or acquiescing in, the making of a conveyance to him of her land.
2. The mortgage executed by plaintiffs' mother was for the purpose of securing the payment of her husband's note, and any extension thereof without her consent, which would be binding upon both parties, so that the holder of the note could decline to accept payment until the date to which such note was extended, and Jenke could refuse to pay it until that time, would release her property so mortgaged. Red River Nat'l Bank v. Bray, 105 Tex. 312, 148 S. W. 291. In this case the court found that the notes had been renewed twice by Mr. Jenke, one of which renewals had been ratified by his wife, but fails to find that they were extended, or to state facts from which we can determine whether any extension was made sufficient to release Mrs. Jenke's land. Upon examining the statement of facts, we find that the court's finding that the notes were renewed is correct, as Jenke signed two written renewals sufficient to toll the statute of limitations, but such promises did not create any extensions for any definite time, nor is the evidence sufficient to show that any agreement was ever made which would have prevented Jenke or Mrs. Jenke or her heirs from at any time paying off the notes. Therefore Mrs. Jenke's land was not released from liability under the mortgage.
3. The deed from Jenke and wife to Dierbach bears the following certificate of acknowledgment:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jasper State Bank v. Braswell
...520, 23 S.W. 493; Hays v. Tilson, 18 Tex.Civ.App. 610, 45 S.W. 479 (application for writ of error refused); Vanderwolk v. Matthaei, Tex.Civ. App., 167 S.W. 304 (application for writ of error refused); Elliott v. C. C. Slaughter Co., Tex.Civ.App., 236 S.W. 1114; Majors v. Strickland, Tex.Civ......
-
Jasper State Bank v. Braswell
...162, 11 S.W. 1121; Baker v. Collins, 4 Tex.Civ.App. 520, 23 S.W. 493; Hays v. Tilson, 18 Tex.Civ.App. 610, 45 SW. 479; Vanderwolk v. Matthaei (Tex.Civ.App.) 167 S.W. 304; Elliott v. C. C. Slaughter Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 236 S.W. 1114; Majors v. Strickland (Tex.Civ.App.) 6 S.W.(2d) 133; Thomaso......
-
Broussard v. American Nat. Ins. Co., 10893.
...v. Braswell, 130 Tex. 549, 111 S.W.2d 1079, 115 A.L.R. 329; City National Bank v. Moody, Tex.Civ. App., 115 S.W.2d 745; Vanderwolk v. Matthaei, Tex.Civ.App., 167 S.W. 304, writ denied; Duke v. Reed, 64 Tex. 705; Connor Bros. v. Williams, 130 Tex. 572, 112 S.W.2d 709, 711; Murrell v. Kelly-G......
-
Fargo Building & Loan Association, a Corp. v. Rice
... ... v. Covell, 10 Neb. 423, 6 N.W. 477; West v ... Middlesex Bkg. Co. 33 S.D. 465, 146 N.W. 598; Bilger ... v. Nunan, 199 F. 549; Vanderwolk v. Matthaei ... (Tex.) 167 S.W. 304; Huber v. Glenrock (Wyo.) ... 231 P. 63; Edwards v. Wray, 12 F. 42; Hubbell v ... Moulson, 53 N.Y ... ...