Varvitsiotes v. Pierre
| Citation | 260 A.D.2d 297,689 N.Y.S.2d 52 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
| Decision Date | 27 April 1999 |
| Parties | ORESTES VARVITSIOTES, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>PAUL C. PIERRE, Appellant. |
Uncontested evidence of discovery noncompliance by defendant, including his repeated and unexplained failures to attend court ordered depositions, warranted the striking of his answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 (see, Kutner v Feiden, Dweck & Sladkus, 223 AD2d 488, lv denied 88 NY2d 802).
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
LW Holdco V LLC v. Puls
...... court's discovery directives. "Uncontested evidence. of discovery noncompliance by defendant warranted the. striking of his answer" (Varvitsiotes v Pierre,. 260 A.D.2d 297 [1st Dept 1999]). . . Accordingly,. defendant Puls' answer is stricken pursuant to CPLR 3126,. [1]. ......
-
Shohat v. Benzion Suky, 440 W. 41ST LLC
...after being directed to do so by the Court warrants the granting of the requested relief in this instance. See Varvitsiotes v. Pierre, 260 A.D.2d 297, 297 (1st Dep'tPage 3 1999) ("Uncontested evidence of discovery noncompliance by defendant . . . warranted the striking of his answer pursuan......
- People v. Ruth
- LINTAS: NEW YORK v. DIRECT TRAVEL, INC.
Request a trial to view additional results