Vaughn v. Guy

Decision Date31 January 1853
Citation17 Mo. 429
PartiesVAUGHN et al., Appellants, v. GUY, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. V. by deed of gift, in 1837, conveyed a female slave to his grand-daughter “and her heirs forever.” A subsequent clause of the deed provided that if the donee should die leaving no lawful issue, the slave and her increase should be equally divided among the sons and daughters of V. Held, V.'s grand-daughter took an absolute estate, and the remainder was void.

Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court.

Clark, for appellant, urged the court to review the decision in the case of Wilson v. Cockrill, 8 Mo. Rep. 1.

Leonard, for respondent. 1. The limitation to the plaintiff, on the death of the first taker, is too remote and therefore void. Fearne on Remainders, 445.2. If this be otherwise, and the present limitation over would be valid as an executory bequest, or as a conditional limitation operating under the statute of uses, yet it is the settled law of this state that such limitation cannot be created by a direct conveyance inter vivos. 8 Mo. Rep. 1. Bilby v. Moore, 1 Dana Rep.

SCOTT, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit begun by the appellants, as the remaindermen under the deed set forth below, against the respondent, who was the father of Susan L. Guy, who intermarried with Davis, and afterwards died in 1851, without issue. The suit was for the negro woman Louisa, named below, and her increase, which were claimed by the respondent. Ervin Guy was the father and heir of Susan L. Guy, who died without issue. The deed of gift is as follows:

“Be it known to all whom it may concern, that I, George Vaughn, of the county of Pike and state of Missouri, for divers good causes and considerations unto me moving, and more especially, for the natural love and affection which I have and bear for my grand-daughter, Susan L. Guy, daughter of Ervin and Nancy L. Guy, do hereby give unto the said Susan L. Guy, a certain negro woman slave, by the name of Louisa, together with her future increase, to her, the said Susan L. Guy and her heirs forever. But in case my said grand-daughter, Susan L. Guy, should die, leaving no lawful issue, then the negro woman slave, Louisa, and her future increase, if any, shall be equally divided between my daughter, Mary M. Fortune, and my sons, Peter T. Vaughn, Thomas R. Vaughn, William L. Vaughn, and my daughter, Harriet Daugherty. Witness, my hand and seal, this 7th day of November, one thousand eight hundred and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Loud v. St. Louis Union Trust Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 6 Abril 1923
    ...while in others the full vigor of the rule has been acknowledged, but no violation was found. Chism's Adm. v. Williams, 29 Mo. 288; Vaughn v. Guy, 17 Mo. 429; Riley Jaeger, 189 S.W. 1168; Bradford v. Blossom, 207 Mo. 177; Shepperd v. Fisher, 206 Mo. 208; Lockridge v. Mace, 109 Mo. 162; Gate......
  • Deacon v. St. Louis Union Trust Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 27 Julio 1917
    ... ... But there can be ... no executory limitations over after an absolute interest in ... personalty. Simmons v. Cabanne, 177 Mo. 336; ... Sullivan v. Garesche, 229 Mo. 496; Brown v ... Tuschoff, 235 Mo. 449; Buckner v. Buckner, 255 ... Mo. 371; Wilson v. Cockrell, 8 Mo. 1; Vaughn v. Guy, ... 17 Mo. 429; Halbert v. Halbert, 21 Mo. 277; ... State ex rel. v. Tolson, 73 Mo. 320; Shepperd v ... Fisher, 207 Mo. 208. The executory interests of ... children's issue are in turn subject to shifting ... executory limitations. Ashley v. Ashley, 6 Sim. 358; ... Gray, ... ...
  • Tindall v. Tindall
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 19 Febrero 1902
  • Lockridge v. Mace
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 14 Marzo 1892
    ...(2) The third section is void as creating a perpetuity. Lord Coke in Partington Case, 10 Rep. 42b; Wilson v. Cockerill, 8 Mo. 1; Vaughan v. Gray, 17 Mo. 429; Halbert Halbert, 21 Mo. 277; Chism's Adm'r v. Williams, 29 Mo. 288. (3) The remainder in fee to the great grand-grandchildren being v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT