Veal v. Chariton Cnty. Court

Decision Date31 January 1852
Citation15 Mo. 412
PartiesVEAL v. CHARITON COUNTY COURT.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

APPEAL FROM CHARITON CIRCUIT COURT.

TURNER, for Appellant.

SCOTT, J.

Veal, who was school commissioner of township 55, in range 19, in the county of Chariton, filed his petition in the Circuit Court of said county, praying for a conditional mandamus to the County Court of that county requiring that body to collect the annual interest due on a bond executed by James Dempsey and others to the said county for the use and benefit of the inhabitants, of said township, or to show cause to the contrary. It appears that the bond bore ten per cent. interest, and that Veal, the commissioner for the said township, which was duly organized for school purposes, had applied to the County Court to enforce the payment of the interest on the bond, which was by its terms made payable annually, and that the court had refused to grant the application.

The County Court, in answering the mandamus, stated, that at the February term, 1849, James Dempsey presented a petition to said court, signed by a majority of the householders of said township, praying said court to reduce the rate of interest on said bond from ten to six per cent. Whereupon it was ordered, that James Dempsey, from and after the 1st January, 1849, pay to the county treasurer, six instead of ten per cent. interest on his bond until further ordered, and that the county treasurer be notified of this order. At the February term of the court, 1851, a petition, signed by a portion of the inhabitants of said township, was presented, praying a rescission of the former order, against which there was a remonstrance of some of the inhabitants. The court, upon a hearing of the petition and remonstrance, ordered that for the future, Dempsey pay ten per cent. interest on his debt. This, in effect, remitted to Dempsey four per cent. of the interest on his debt for upwards of two years. Upon the filing of the answer, it was demurred to by Veal, and his demurrer was overruled and a judgment for costs rendered against him, from which he appealed to this court.

Section numbered sixteen in every township was granted by the Congress of the United States to this State for the use of the inhabitants of such township, for the use of schools. This grant was solemnly accepted by the people of this State, in convention assembled, who at the same time declared, that it should be the duty of the General Assembly to apply the funds which may arise from...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Montgomery County v. Auchley
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 24, 1891
    ... ... Auchley, Executor, et al., Appellants Supreme Court of Missouri, Second Division February 24, 1891 ...           ... courts in the management of these funds. In Veal v ... County Court , 15 Mo. 412, the county court had loaned ... school ... ...
  • Sturgeon v. Hampton
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1885
    ...swamp lands to the county placed the legal title in it in trust for school purposes. State ex rel. v. New Madrid Co., 51 Mo. 85; Veal v. Chariton Co., 15 Mo. 412; Butler v. Chariton Co., 13 Mo. 112. And the trust could not be diverted by the trustee. Perry on Trusts, secs. 700, 733, 734; Mu......
  • State v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • July 8, 1918
    ...Bush), 74; 94 Ky. 177; 19 S.W. 405; 15 L. R. A. 825; 59 N.W. 907; 24 S.W. 272; 49 Mo. 236; 54 Ark. 468; 34 P. 274; 62 F. 417; 3 N.E. 165; 15 Mo. 412; Col. 195; 29 La.Ann. 77; 40 Neb. 298; 56 Miss. 758; 13 Barb. 400; 73 Md. 521; 126 N.C. 689; 6 Ind. 83; 116 Id. 329; 16 Miss. 773; 31 La. 175;......
  • Knox County v. Hunolt
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 23, 1892
    ...party known to the law who can sue for school funds, and recover in a suit at common law. Butler v. County Court, 13 Mo. 112; Veal v. County Court, 15 Mo. 412. (3) No remedy can be pursued other than the one prescribed by Revised Statutes, 1879, section 1331. Moore v. White, 45 Mo. 206; Lin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT