Vellanti v. Maercks, 90-2278
| Decision Date | 03 December 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-2278,90-2278 |
| Citation | 590 So.2d 495 |
| Parties | Christine VELLANTI, Appellant, v. Ralph MAERCKS, M.D., and Ralph Maercks, M.D., P.A., Appellees. 590 So.2d 495, 16 Fla. L. Week. D2993 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Spence Payne Masington Needle & Eversole, and Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, for appellant.
Lee, Schulte, Murphy & Eaton, and Thomas J. Schulte, and Rebecca Greer Tanner, for appellees.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.
Appellant, Christine Vellanti (Vellanti), appeals a final summary judgment in favor of appellees, Ralph Maercks and Ralph Maercks, M.D., P.A. (Dr. Maercks). We reverse and remand.
Vellanti sued her psychiatrist, Dr. Maercks, on December 11, 1987, alleging medical malpractice. The trial court found that the two year statute of limitations began to run as of April 5, 1985, because on that date Vellanti signed a writing purporting to release Dr. Maercks from all liability arising out of the treatment. The trial court reasoned that Vellanti must have had actual knowledge of her cause of action when she signed the release and entered summary judgment for Dr. Maercks.
Summary judgment is improper where the pleadings and record reflect conflicting issues of material fact. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Levey v. Getelman, 408 So.2d 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Vellanti's signing of the purported release may prove that she had actual knowledge of her cause of action. However, Vellanti also presented evidence possibly indicating that she did not know of her cause of action against her psychiatrist until later.
Therefore, there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the action was brought within the two year statute of limitations. See Sec. 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1985). Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Keller v. Reed
...the limitations period began to run is in dispute, this issue of material fact precluded summary judgment. Aprile; Vellanti v. Maercks, 590 So.2d 495 (Fla. 3d DCA1991); Branford State Bank v. Hackney Tractor Co., Inc., 455 So.2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA1984). We reject the appellee's contention, a......
-
Norsworthy v. Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc., 91-1367
...So.2d 249 (Fla.2d DCA 1992), question certified on motion for reh.; Rogers v. Ruiz, 594 So.2d 756 (Fla.2d DCA 1991); Vellanti v. Maercks, 590 So.2d 495 (Fla.3d DCA 1991). Like the other district courts, we find that applying the rule of Barron and Bogorff to the widely divergent fact patter......