Ventimiglia By and Through Ventimiglia v. Moffitt

Decision Date17 December 1986
Docket NumberNo. 4-86-1719,4-86-1719
Citation12 Fla. L. Weekly 25,502 So.2d 14
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 25 Anthony VENTIMIGLIA, a minor, By and Through his parents and natural guardians, Carmen V. VENTIMIGLIA and Salvatore Ventimiglia; and Carmen V. Ventimiglia, Individually, and Salvatore Ventimiglia, Individually, Petitioners, v. Joan MOFFITT, M.D., Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Gregory Barnhart of Montgomery, Searcy & Denney, P.A., and Russell S. Bohn of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for petitioners.

Daniel J. Lewis of Kern, Augustine & Glantz, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents, Joan E. Moffitt, M.D. and Moffitt and Moffitt, P.A.

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of certiorari seeking to set aside the trial court's order compelling a physician-witness to produce copies of records of other patients he has treated for conditions similar to that suffered by the claimant. The trial court provided that any possible reference to the identity of the patients be deleted from the records and protected from discovery. The trial court's order relied on the fact that the physician predicated his diagnosis and opinion in claimant's case, at least in part, upon his experience with the other patients. Hence, the court concluded that discovery of the medical history of those patients was relevant to the issues involved in claimant's action against the respondents. We believe the trial court acted within its discretion in permitting discovery of relevant material while protecting the confidentiality of the physician's other patients. Cf. Fischer v. Hofmann Wholesale Nurseries, Inc., 487 So.2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Roe v. Planned Parenthood Sw. Ohio Region
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 1 Julio 2009
    ...non-party patient." Id. at 642-643, citing Terre Haute Regional Hosp. v. Trueblood (Ind.1992), 600 N.E.2d 1358, 1359; Ventimiglia v. Moffitt (Fla.App.1986), 502 So.2d 14; Ziegler v. Superior Court in and for Pima Cty. (1982), 134 Ariz. 390, 394, 656 P.2d 1251; and Community Hosp. Assn. v. D......
  • Terre Haute Regional Hosp., Inc. v. Trueblood
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 21 Octubre 1992
    ...Hosp.), Inc. v. Kemper (1989), Fla.App., 543 So.2d 470; State ex rel Benoit v. Randall (1968), Mo., 431 S.W.2d 107; Ventimiglia v. Moffitt (1986), Fla.App., 502 So.2d 14; Osterman v. Ehrenworth (1969), 106 N.J.Super. 515, 256 A.2d 123. But see contra, Parkson v. Central DuPage Hosp. (1982),......
  • Baptist Mem. Hosp. v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 6 Enero 2000
    ...records of 140 patients were held discoverable after names, addresses, occupation and marital status was removed); Ventimiglia v. Moffitt, 502 So.2d 14 (Fla.Ct.App.1986)(permitting discovery of medical records while protecting patient confidentiality); Osterman v. Ehrenworth, 106 N.J.Super.......
  • In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 20 Diciembre 2001
    ...Cal.3d 924 (1974); Cmty. Hosp. Ass'n v. District Court, 570 P.2d 243, 244-45, 194 Colo. 98, 100-01 (1977) (en banc); Ventimiglia v. Moffitt, 502 So.2d 14 (Fla.App.1986); Terre Haute Regional Hosp., Inc. v. Trueblood, 600 N.E.2d 1358, 1360-62 (Ind.1992); Baptist Mem. Hosp. v. Johnson, 754 So......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT