Vernon v. Boggs
| Decision Date | 30 September 1821 |
| Citation | Vernon v. Boggs, 1 Mo. 116 (Mo. 1821) |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Parties | VERNON & BLAKE v. BOGGS. |
M'GIRK, C. J.
This is an application to this Court, to issue a mandamus to the Circuit Court, for the first judicial circuit, to compel that Court to enter up a judgment. The case, as made out, is, that some time heretofore, the plaintiffs filed their declaration in the Clerk's office of Howard county; that the defendant thereupon appeared before the Clerk in vacation, and confessed a judgment for the amount claimed in the declaration. So the matter stood till July term of that Court, 1821. That after notice to the defendant to that effect, application was, at said term, made to the Court to have the said confession entered up in due form...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
The State ex rel. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Klein
... ... the lower court. State ex rel. v. Philips, 97 Mo ... 331; State ex rel. v. Tracey, 94 Mo. 217; State ... ex rel. v. Lewis, 71 Mo. 172; Vernon v. Boggs, ... 1 Mo. 116, 274; Pettigrew v. Washington Co., 43 Ark ... 33; McCrary v. Rodgers, 34 Ark. 298; County of ... Boone v. Todd, 3 Mo ... ...
-
Piper v. Aldrich
...30), as to contracts on which a right of action accrued prior to the passage of the same, are unconstitutional--11 Wis. 358; 1 Const. 129; 1 Mo. 116; 4 Mo. 50. Admitting the acts complained of to be valid, the court below erred in vacating the judgment. There was personal service had on the......
- Ex parte Bellows