Vernon v. Nassau County Medical Center
| Decision Date | 11 June 1984 |
| Citation | 102 A.D.2d 852,477 N.Y.S.2d 24 |
| Parties | Michael VERNON, Respondent, v. NASSAU COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Edward G. McCabe, County Atty., Mineola (Kathryn Driscoll Hopkins, Deputy County Atty., Mineola, of counsel; Angela Castro on brief), for appellants.
John L. Juliano, East Northport, for respondent.
Before MOLLEN, P.J., and TITONE, MANGANO and LAWRENCE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 6, 1983, which (1) granted plaintiff's motion to reargue defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute which was granted in a prior order of the same court, dated May 20, 1983, and (2) upon reargument, vacated that order of May 20, 1983, and denied defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute.
Order dated July 6, 1983, modified, on the law, by deleting the provision which vacated the order dated May 20, 1983 and denied defendants' motion to dismiss and substituting therefor a provision adhering to the original determination. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In its decision and order dated July 6, 1983, which, inter alia, upon reargument, denied defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, Special Term was of the view, and correctly so, that plaintiff's failure to timely respond to a demand to serve and file a note of issue pursuant to CPLR 3216 was the result of law office failure and noted, again correctly, that CPLR 2005 (L.1983, ch. 318), which had been enacted on June 21, 1983 (i.e., subsequent to the order of May 20, 1983 granting defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute) restored discretion to the courts to excuse law office failure. In enacting CPLR 2005, the Legislature reinstated the pre-Barasch rule that the "determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the sound discretion of the trial court" (De Vito v. Marine Midland Bank, 100 A.D.2d 530, 473 N.Y.S.2d 218). CPLR 2005 took effect on June 21, 1983 and applies to "every action * * * heretofore commenced and which * * * still is pending before a court" (L.1983, ch. 318, § 3). The instant action was still pending before Special Term when it entertained the plaintiff's timely motion for reargument and, therefore, Special Term did not err in applying CPLR 2005 (Thelma Sanders & Assoc. v. Hague Dev. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 964, 475 N.Y.S.2d 104).
However, in order to justify vacatur of a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Stukas v. Streiter
...Hosp., 60 N.Y.2d 685, 468 N.Y.S.2d 460, 455 N.E.2d 1255; Wind v. Cacho, 111 A.D.2d 808, 490 N.Y.S.2d 345; Vernon v. Nassau County Med. Center, 102 A.D.2d 852, 477 N.Y.S.2d 24)" ( id. at 787, 501 N.Y.S.2d 411). None of the three Court of Appeals decisions cited by the Amsler Court involved t......
-
Mosberg v. Elahi
...Paratore, 60 N.Y.2d 851, 470 N.Y.S.2d 138, 458 N.E.2d 379; Reed v. Friedman, 117 A.D.2d 661, 498 N.Y.S.2d 399; Vernon v. Nassau County Med. Center, 102 A.D.2d 852, 477 N.Y.S.2d 24; Fileccia v. Massapequa Gen. Hosp., supra BRACKEN, J.P., and O'BRIEN and RITTER, JJ., concur. KOOPER, J., disse......
-
Amsler v. Verrilli
...Hosp., 60 N.Y.2d 685, 468 N.Y.S.2d 460, 455 N.E.2d 1255; Wind v. Cacho, 111 A.D.2d 808, 490 N.Y.S.2d 345; Vernon v. Nassau County Med. Center, 102 A.D.2d 852, 477 N.Y.S.2d 24). As stated recently by the Court of Appeals in Fiore v. Galang, 64 N.Y.2d 999, 1000-1001, 489 N.Y.2d 47, 478 N.E.2d......
-
Furrukh v. Forest Hills Hosp.
...v. Elahi, 80 N.Y.2d 941, 590 N.Y.S.2d 866, 605 N.E.2d 353;Reed v. Friedman, 117 A.D.2d 661, 498 N.Y.S.2d 399;Vernon v. Nassau County Med. Ctr., 102 A.D.2d 852, 477 N.Y.S.2d 24). Accordingly, that branch of the appellant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint for f......