Versace v. 1540 Broadway L.P.

Decision Date15 March 2017
Citation48 N.Y.S.3d 666,148 A.D.3d 483
Parties Mark VERSACE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 1540 BROADWAY L.P., et al., Defendants–Respondents, Nest International, et al., Defendants. [And a Third Party Action] Schindler Elevator Corporation, Second Third–Party Plaintiff, v. Elpro, Inc., Second Third–Party Defendant, Vertitron Midwest, Inc., Second Third–Party Defendant–Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Mulholland, Minion, Davey, McNiff & Beyrer, Williston Park (John A. Beyrer of counsel), for appellant.

O'Connor, O'Connor, Hintz & Deveney, Melville (Robert C. O'Connor of counsel), for 1540 Broadway L.P., 1540 Broadway NY, LLC, Virgin Entertainment Group, Inc., and Virgin Megastores (USA), L.P., respondents.

Steve S. Efron, New York, for Schindler Elevator Corporation, respondent.

Rende Ryan & Downes, LLP, White Plains (Roland T. Koke of counsel), for Minnesota Elevator, Inc., and Vertitron Midwest, Inc., respondents.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., ANDRIAS, GISCHE, WEBBER, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered November 17, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation's motion for summary judgment dismissing the strict products liability claims as against it, granted defendant Minnesota Elevator, Inc. and second third-party defendant Vertitron Midwest, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment dismissing the strict products liability claims as against Minnesota, granted defendants 1540 Broadway L.P., 1540 Broadway NY, LLC, Virgin Entertainment Group, Inc., and Virgin Megastores (USA), L.P.'s motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240(1) claim as against them, and denied plaintiff's motion to amended the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages against Minnesota, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny Schindler's and Minnesota and Vertitron's motions as to the design defect and failure to warn claims predicated on an alleged defective elevator shim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, an elevator mechanic, allegedly was injured in January 2006 when an elevator that he had been dispatched to repair suddenly dropped, with him inside, allegedly because a defective shim had caused the guide shoe to crack and because of the failure of a low-pressure switch. Defendant Minnesota and third-party defendant Vertitron established prima facie that the low-pressure switch and the shim (a piece bolted between the guide shoes and the elevator cab to create a snug fit between them) were not defective by demonstrating that the elevator was inspected and approved for service by the City of New York after it was first installed in 1995 and again in 2005, after it was returned to service after having been repaired, and that the low-pressure switch was tested every two years by the City (see McArdle v. Navistar Intl. Corp., 293 A.D.2d 931, 742 N.Y.S.2d 146 [3d Dept.2002] ).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to the defectiveness of the low-pressure switch. His expert's assertion that it was the switch...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Booth v. Otis Elevator Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 18, 2021
    ...products liability claim by submitting evidence that the elevator door at issue was not defective (see Versace v. 1540 Broadway L.P., 148 A.D.3d 483, 48 N.Y.S.3d 666 [1st Dept. 2017] ; see also Haynes v. Estate of Goldman, Inc., 62 A.D.3d 519, 521, 880 N.Y.S.2d 609 [1st Dept. 2009] ).In opp......
  • Booth v. Otis Elevator Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 18, 2021
    ... ... was not defective (s ee Versace v 1540 Broadway ... L.P., 148 A.D.3d 483 [1st Dept 2017]; see also ... ...
  • Elkin v. Labis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 15, 2017

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT