Vesper v. Vesper

Citation359 N.Y.S.2d 1009,46 A.D.2d 729
PartiesGeorge W. VESPER, Appellant, v. Edith M. VESPER, Respondent.
Decision Date24 October 1974
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Offermann, Fallon, Mahoney & Adner, Eugene Pigott, Jr., Buffalo, for appellant.

Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Schuller & James, Herbert H. Blumberg, Buffalo, for respondent.

Before MOULE, J.P., and CARDAMONE, SIMONS, MAHONEY and GOLDMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

In this matrimonial dispute the respondent-wife's affidavits show that she controls over $65,000 in various bank accounts; appellant-husband in his affidavits and by way of a separate cause of action claims ownership of most of these funds. Under such circumstances, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in awarding temporary alimony, child support and counsel fees to the respondent. In affirming we note that we have held repeatedly that "the remedy for any claimed inequity in awards of temporary alimony, child support or maintenance is a speedy trial where the respective finances of the parties can be ascertained and a permanent award based on the evidence may be made" (Tabor v. Tabor, 39 A.2d 640, 331 N.Y.S.2d 102; Dobbin v. Dobbin, 39 A.D.2d 836, 333 N.Y.S.2d 154; Frost v. Frost, 38 A.D.2d 786, 328 N.Y.S.2d 77).

Order unanimously affirmed with costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Sterlace v. Sterlace
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 13, 1978
    ...court's time seeking review of an order for temporary alimony." (Kunerth v. Kunerth, 58 A.D.2d 1010, 397 N.Y.S.2d 39; Vesper v. Vesper, 46 A.D.2d 729, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1009; Schoellkopf v. Schoellkopf, 41 A.D.2d 599, 340 N.Y.S.2d 348; Gelow v. Gelow, 41 A.D.2d 556, 339 N.Y.S.2d 781.) Thus an ea......
  • Kunerth v. Kunerth
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 12, 1977
    ...from this rule. Indeed, this appeal has unnecessarily delayed for nearly a year the trial disposition of this case (see Vesper v. Vesper, 46 A.D.2d 729, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1009; Schoellkopf v. Schoellkopf, 41 A.D.2d 599, 340 N.Y.S.2d 348; Gelow v. Gelow, 41 A.D.2d 556, 339 N.Y.S.2d 781; Dobbin v.......
  • Alberts v. Alberts
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 5, 1993
    ...291; Cloutier v. Cloutier, 94 A.D.2d 974, 463 N.Y.S.2d 739; Kunerth v. Kunerth, 58 A.D.2d 1010, 397 N.Y.S.2d 39; Vesper v. Vesper, 46 A.D.2d 729, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1009). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, CALLAHAN, J.P., and BOOMER, GREEN, BOEHM and DAVIS, JJ., concur. ...
  • Clancy v. Clancy
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 11, 1986
    ...an appeal (Cloutier v. Cloutier, 94 A.D.2d 974, 463 N.Y.S.2d 739; Kunerth v. Kunerth, 58 A.D.2d 1010, 397 N.Y.S.2d 39; Vesper v. Vesper, 46 A.D.2d 729, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1009). Order unanimously affirmed, without ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT