Vesper v. Vesper
Citation | 359 N.Y.S.2d 1009,46 A.D.2d 729 |
Parties | George W. VESPER, Appellant, v. Edith M. VESPER, Respondent. |
Decision Date | 24 October 1974 |
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Offermann, Fallon, Mahoney & Adner, Eugene Pigott, Jr., Buffalo, for appellant.
Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Schuller & James, Herbert H. Blumberg, Buffalo, for respondent.
Before MOULE, J.P., and CARDAMONE, SIMONS, MAHONEY and GOLDMAN, JJ.
In this matrimonial dispute the respondent-wife's affidavits show that she controls over $65,000 in various bank accounts; appellant-husband in his affidavits and by way of a separate cause of action claims ownership of most of these funds. Under such circumstances, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in awarding temporary alimony, child support and counsel fees to the respondent. In affirming we note that we have held repeatedly that "the remedy for any claimed inequity in awards of temporary alimony, child support or maintenance is a speedy trial where the respective finances of the parties can be ascertained and a permanent award based on the evidence may be made" (Tabor v. Tabor, 39 A.2d 640, 331 N.Y.S.2d 102; Dobbin v. Dobbin, 39 A.D.2d 836, 333 N.Y.S.2d 154; Frost v. Frost, 38 A.D.2d 786, 328 N.Y.S.2d 77).
Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sterlace v. Sterlace
...court's time seeking review of an order for temporary alimony." (Kunerth v. Kunerth, 58 A.D.2d 1010, 397 N.Y.S.2d 39; Vesper v. Vesper, 46 A.D.2d 729, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1009; Schoellkopf v. Schoellkopf, 41 A.D.2d 599, 340 N.Y.S.2d 348; Gelow v. Gelow, 41 A.D.2d 556, 339 N.Y.S.2d 781.) Thus an ea......
-
Kunerth v. Kunerth
...from this rule. Indeed, this appeal has unnecessarily delayed for nearly a year the trial disposition of this case (see Vesper v. Vesper, 46 A.D.2d 729, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1009; Schoellkopf v. Schoellkopf, 41 A.D.2d 599, 340 N.Y.S.2d 348; Gelow v. Gelow, 41 A.D.2d 556, 339 N.Y.S.2d 781; Dobbin v.......
-
Alberts v. Alberts
...291; Cloutier v. Cloutier, 94 A.D.2d 974, 463 N.Y.S.2d 739; Kunerth v. Kunerth, 58 A.D.2d 1010, 397 N.Y.S.2d 39; Vesper v. Vesper, 46 A.D.2d 729, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1009). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, CALLAHAN, J.P., and BOOMER, GREEN, BOEHM and DAVIS, JJ., concur. ...
-
Clancy v. Clancy
...an appeal (Cloutier v. Cloutier, 94 A.D.2d 974, 463 N.Y.S.2d 739; Kunerth v. Kunerth, 58 A.D.2d 1010, 397 N.Y.S.2d 39; Vesper v. Vesper, 46 A.D.2d 729, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1009). Order unanimously affirmed, without ...