Vicksburg Bank v. Adams
Decision Date | 11 January 1897 |
Citation | 21 So. 401,74 Miss. 179 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | VICKSBURG BANK v. WIRT ADAMS, STATE REVENUE AGENT |
October 1896
FROM the circuit court of Warren county HON. W. K. McLAURIN Judge.
This suit had its origin in the effort of the state revenue agent to collect from the bank taxes due to the city of Vicksburg for the years 1886, 1887, 1888, and 1889, and which he claimed the bank had wrongfully escaped. Section 3, of chapter 34, laws of 1894, p. 29, under which the revenue agent acted, is in the following words, viz.: Acting upon this statute, the state revenue agent gave the following notice to the city tax assessor and collector (the same person held both offices), viz.:
In pursuance of this notice, the city assessor and tax collector made the following assessment, viz.:
FIRMS TAXED.
Vicksburg
Bank for
1886
$ 75, 000
Vicksburg
Bank for
1887
75, 000
Vicksburg
Bank for
1888
75, 000
Vicksburg
Bank for
1889
75, 000
And gave proper notices thereof, under the statute.
The matter was thus brought before the municipal authorities of the city of Vicksburg, where the bank objected to the additional assessment, specifying the following objections:
1. Said assessment was not made in a legal manner or by a person authorized by law to make it.
2. Said bank is not subject to be so assessed, or assessed at all, for any one or more of said years.
3. Said property has not escaped assessment or taxation for said years, is not liable to be assessed now, is not in existence, the money was not out at interest, the property was not loaned money, the valuation is excessive.
4. The law under which said assessment was made is unconstitutional and void. Acts of 1894, p. 29.
5. Said assessment is the act of the state revenue agent, and not the constitutional assessor.
6. Said assessment was made under and by virtue of the order and directions of the state revenue agent, and not by the assessor and tax collector voluntarily, as his official act within and from a sense of official duty, but under fear and threats produced and made by said revenue agent, that he would be harassed by suits on his official bond if he refused; and did so also to avoid a possible liability on his said bond if he failed to obey the said orders of said state revenue agent; and said assessment was made without any knowledge on the part of the collector or assessor as to the facts on which it is based. Said revenue agent had no authority to give such notice to the assessor and collector before the end of the present fiscal year.
7. The passage of the act providing for the election of the state revenue agent (Acts of 1894, p. 29), was not in accordance with § 71 of the constitution of Mississippi, so far as it provides for the present incumbent holding said office, and so far as it provides for assessments to be made as therein enacted.
8. Said bank was assessed for the years 1886, 1887, on February 15, 1894, by said assessor and collector before notice from said revenue agent for him to so assess on said capital stock, and such assessment has been or will be returned with the general assessment of property for the year 1894 by said assessor and collector, and said bank paid the privilege tax, as provided for by law, for the years 1888 and 1889 in lieu of all the taxes.
9. The said notices are insufficient in law.
10. Said bank objects to said assessment as wholly unwarranted by the law or the facts, and upon other grounds, to be stated on the hearing.
The matter was heard by the municipal authorities, and the additional assessment was disapproved, and the state revenue agent appealed to the circuit court.
The defenses made in the circuit court by the bank were, that for the years 1886 and 1887 it had paid a privilege tax, and it had been assessed upon its capital stock and paid its taxes thereon before action by the revenue agent. The assessment shown for said years, and which the bank offered to introduce in evidence, was also an additional assessment, and it was made in 1894, and was as follows:
and Hogs.
OR FIRM
from Lands.
of Tax.
Bank of
Vicksburg
for 1886
Bank of
Vicksburg
for 1887
This assessment had been duly approved by the proper authority. The bank offered to show, by parol, in connection with said roll, that the $ 10, 000 upon said assessment for said years, 1886 and 1887, was not, as shown by the roll, "money on hand, on deposit or at interest, " but was its capital stock, and that it had paid its taxes on said assessment. The court below excluded this evidence, but permitted the revenue agent to show that the $ 75, 000 on the assessment, the correctness of which was the subject of litigation, was capital stock, and not "horses, etc."
The defense for the years 1888 and 1889 was, that the bank had paid a privilege tax for said years, under the act approved March 8, 1888 (Laws, pp. 15, 16). Under this act, the privilege tax exempted the bank from ad valorem taxes, but there was no such...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Byers Mach. Co. v. Cobb Bros. Const. Co.
... ... constitute the assessment roll ... Vicksburg ... Bank v. Adams, 21 So. 401 ... An ... assessment of personal property need not ... ...
-
Koehring Co. v. Hyde Const. Co.
...of statutory provisions that this court can render judgment for damages against an appellant.' Also, in Vicksburg Bank v. Adams, 74 Miss. 179, 196, 21 So. 401, 402-403 (1897): '* * * and damages can only be awarded in the cases expressly provided for by the statute.' In the later case the c......
-
Equitable Finance Co. v. Board of Sup'rs of Lee County
...cases are Vicksburg Bank v. Worrell, 67 Miss. 47 (1889); Bank of Oxford v. Town of Oxford, 70 Miss. 505, 12 So. 203 (1892); Bank v. Adams, 74 Miss. 179 (1900); Hawkins v. Mangum, 78 Miss. 97, 29 So. 872 and Adams v. Bank of Oxford, 78 Miss. 532 (1900). Hawkins v. Mangum, 78 Miss. 97, is an ......
-
Robinson Land & Lumber Co. v. Roberson
...Our court in Madison Co. v. Frasier, 78 Miss. 880, held, that no appeal will lie until the assessment is finally approved and in Vicksburg v. Adams, 74 Miss. 179, and Morris Ice Co. v. Adams, 75 Miss. 410, held a personal judgment against the taxpayer on appeal is not authorized. If the cou......