Viele v. Keeler
Decision Date | 01 December 1891 |
Citation | 129 N.Y. 190,29 N.E. 78 |
Parties | VIELE v. KEELER. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from supreme court, general term, third department. Reversed.
This was an action by Maurice E. Viele against William H. Keeler for the specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real estate. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
S. O. Shepard, for appellant.
Isaac Lawson, for respondent.
On the 10th day of July, 1890, the plaintiff, by an instrument in writting, agreed to convey, and the defendant to purchase, for the sum of $15,000, the undivided half of certain real estate situated in the city of Albany, and particularly described in the record. The plaintiff stipulated on his part to execute and deliver to the defendant, on or before the 1st day of September thereafter, a warranty deed of the premises, with the usual full covenants, which would be sufficient to vest in the defendant an estate in fee-simple absolute, free and clear of all liens and incumbrances. Within the time provided in the agreement the plaintiff duly executed, acknowledged, and tendered to the defendant a warranty deed of the premises described in the agreement, which contained all the usual full covenants, but the defendant refused to accept it, on the ground that the plaintiff was not the owner of the land described therein in fee-simple absolute, and that the deed would not vest title in the defendant. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant was bound to specifically perform his part of the contract, and the controversy was submitted upon an agreed case to the general term, where judgment was directed for the defendant. The only title which the plaintiff had was derived from his wife, Maria Viele, who died in the month of December, 1889, having duly executed her will, which was admitted to probate in the surrogate's court of Albany county, in and by which she devised the land in question to her husband, the plaintiff. Mrs. Viele was a daughter of Charles D. Townsend, who, it is admitted, was, in his life-time, seised of an estate in the lands in question in fee-simple absolute. The controversy is narrowed down to the question whether Mrs. Viele took, under her father's will, an estate for life or in fee. Charles D. Townsend died in Albany in the month of January, 1848, the owner in fee-simple of the lot of land described in the contract. He left surviving one son and three daughters, his only children and heirs at law, of whom Mrs. Viele was one. He left a will dated January 28, 1836, and two codicils, all of which were admitted to probate in Albany county. The title of Mrs. Viele depends upon the construction to be given to these instruments. The executors were directed to proceed immediately after taking an inventory to collect all outstanding debts, except such as they deemed properly secured or invested, and out of such debts and the rents and issues of the estate to pay all the debts of the deceased. After the payment of debts the executors were directed to divide the estate into four equal parts. One of these parts the testator gave absolutely to his son John F. Townsend. The other three equal parts were disposed of in the following language: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ely v. Megie
...cases in this court. Matter of Willets, 112 N. Y. 289, 665,19 N. E. 690;Redfield v. Redfield, 126 N. Y. 466, 27 N. E. 1032;Viele v. Keeler, 129 N. Y. 190, 29 N. E. 78. The case of Austin v. Oakes, 117 N. Y. 577, 589,23 N. E. 193, 194, is distinguishable from the present case. In that case t......
-
Osher's Will, In re
...868, 870; citing Herzog v. Title Guar. & Trust Co., 177 N.Y. 86, 69 N.E. 283; Hard v. Ashley, 117 N.Y. 606, 23 N.E. 177; Viele v. Keeler, 129 N.Y. 190, 29 N.E. 78; Redfield v. Redfield, 126 N.Y. 466, 27 N.E. 1032; Matter of Miller, 201 Misc. 279, 108 N.Y.S.2d 186). Further 9 Misc.2d p. 405,......
-
Greenwich Trust Co. v. Converse
... ... Repugnant provisions must be construed in such way as to ... preserve the intention of the testatrix. Viele v ... Keeler, 129 N.Y. 190, 199, 29 N.E. 78. The language of ... the codicil does not either necessarily or impliedly lead to ... the conclusion ... ...
-
Goldberg's Estate, In re
...(Herzog v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 177 N.Y. 86, 69 N.E. 283, 67 L.R.A. 146; Hard v. Ashley, 117 N.Y. 606, 23 N.E. 177; Viele v. Keller, 129 N.Y. 190, 29 N.E. 78; Redfield v. Redfield, 126 N.Y. 466, 27 N.E. 1032; Matter of Miller's Will, 201 Misc. 279, 108 N.Y.S.2d In the case at bar th......