Vill. of Palatine, Corp. v. Palatine Assocs., LLC
Decision Date | 16 March 2012 |
Docket Number | No. 1–10–2707.,1–10–2707. |
Citation | 966 N.E.2d 1174 |
Parties | The VILLAGE OF PALATINE, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. PALATINE ASSOCIATES, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Company, a New York Corporation, and All American Title Agency, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, Defendants (All American Title Agency, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, Defendant–Appellant; Palatine Associates, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Corporation, Defendant–Appellee). |
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Strecker, Jepson & Associates, Lake Zurich (Paul H. Strecker, Christy J. Jepson, of counsel), for Appellant.
Ryan & Ryan, Chicago (William E. Ryan, Timothy J. Ryan, Michael W. Ryan, Lauren E. Ryan, of counsel), for Appellee.
¶ 1 This appeal arises from a condemnation proceeding brought by the Village of Palatine1 (Village), seeking to acquire real property in Palatine, Illinois, that was being used for a shopping center. The Village intends to acquire the property to be used as a police facility, with other municipal uses. The Village paid over $6 million to the owner, defendant Palatine Associates, LLC (Palatine Associates), in just compensation, and any claims of tenants was to be apportioned from the money received. Palatine Associates filed a motion requesting the trial court to find that appellant All American Title Agency, LLC (All American), had no interest in the final award of just compensation because its leases had terminated prior to the entry of the award. The court agreed and All American appeals, arguing that its leases were not terminated prior to the entry of the final award of just compensation. We affirm.
¶ 4 Palatine Associates was the owner of the property at issue in this case (subject property), which consisted of a shopping center with a number of tenants, including Sears and All American. All American was a tenant for two spaces and had entered into two written leases in 2005. The first lease, dated April 28, 2005, was for "approximately 7500 square feet" at 601 North Hicks Road (the 601 lease), for a lease term beginning June 1, 2005, and ending on May 31, 2015, with the option for All American to extend the lease for two additional option periods of five years each. The second lease, dated October 28, 2005, was for "approximately 2500 square feet" at 565 North Hicks Road (the 565 lease), for a lease term from November 1, 2005, through May 31, 2015, with the option for All American to extend the lease for two additional option periods of five years each. Both leases contained similar terms.
¶ 5 Article 2 of each lease provided:
¶ 6 The leases required All American to pay a fixed base rent, as well as "additional rent," defined as "Real Estate Taxes and CAM Charges [2 ] based upon Tenant's pro-rata share[ ] (capped at $3.00 per square foot through [the] initial lease term)." Article 4 of the leases stated that "Tenant shall pay to Landlord, * * * as ‘Fixed Base Rent’ for the Premises during the term of this Lease without any deduction or setoff, except as expressly provided in this lease, the amount set forth in Section 1.1, in equal monthly installments, in advance, on the first day of each calendar month."
¶ 7 Article 5 of the 565 lease explained how to calculate taxes:
Article 5 of the 601 lease is identical except that the 601 lease deemed All American's proportionate share of taxes to be 4.49%. Article 6 of the leases provided that Article 6 further provided:
¶ 8 Article 12 of the leases provided the following concerning repairs by Palatine Associates:
¶ 9 Article 16 of the leases referred to eminent domain proceedings and provided that "Tenant shall share in any condemnation award for the difference between MV [3 ] of the space and rent being paid for remaining term of the lease." Article 17 applied to any default by the lessee:
¶ 10 Article 24 of the leases concerns breach of the leases by Palatine Associates:
¶ 11 Article 26 of the leases set forth various miscellaneous provisions:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Asset Recovery Contracting, LLC v. Walsh Constr. Co. of Ill.
...of a contract as a matter of law is de novo. Village of Palatine v. Palatine Associates, LLC, 2012 IL App (1st) 102707, ¶ 44, 359 Ill.Dec. 486, 966 N.E.2d 1174 (citing Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 216 Ill.2d 100, 129, 296 Ill.Dec. 448, 835 N.E.2d 801 (2005) ). De nov......
-
Greenhill v. Reit Mgmt. & Research, LLC
...analysis that a trial judge would perform." Village of Palatine v. Palatine Associates, LLC , 2012 IL App (1st) 102707, ¶ 41, 359 Ill.Dec. 486, 966 N.E.2d 1174.¶ 46 B. Negligence Principles ¶ 47 In a negligence action, the plaintiff must plead and prove the existence of a duty owed by the d......
-
Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. W.E. O'Neil Constr. Co.
...entry of summary judgment is de novo. See Village of Palatine v. Palatine Associates, L.L.C, 2012 IL App (1st) 102707, ¶ 43, 359 Ill.Dec. 486, 966 N.E.2d 1174 ; see also Ragan v. Columbia Mutual Insurance Co., 183 Ill.2d 342, 349, 233 Ill.Dec. 643, 701 N.E.2d 493 (1998) ; Outboard Marine, 1......
- Greggs USA, Inc. v. 400 East Professional Associates, LP