Volk v. Demeerleer
Decision Date | 13 November 2014 |
Docket Number | No. 31814–1–III.,31814–1–III. |
Citation | 184 Wash.App. 389,337 P.3d 372 |
Court | Washington Court of Appeals |
Parties | Beverly R. VOLK as Guardian for Jack Alan Schiering, a minor; and as Personal Representative of the Estates of Philip Lee Schiering and Rebecca Leigh Schiering, and on behalf of the statutory beneficiaries of Philip Lee Schiering; and Brian Winkler, individually, Appellants, v. James B. DEMEERLEER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jan DeMeerleer; Howard Ashby, M.D. and “Jane Doe” Ashby, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof; Spokane Psychiatric Clinic, P.S., a Washington business entity and healthcare provider ; and Does 1 through 5, Respondents. |
Michael Jon Riccelli, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellants.
David A. Kulisch, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Defendant.
Robert F. Sestero, II, Patrick Mark Risken, Evans, Craven & Lackie, P.S., David A. Kulisch, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondents.
Paul Arthur Bastine, Attorney at Law, Spokane Valley, WA, Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington State Psychological Association.
¶ 1 We undertake the humbling and daunting task of demarcating the duty a mental health professional owed to third parties to protect them from the violent behavior of the professional's outpatient client. The parties, the mental health care profession, and the residents of Washington State would be better served by the legislature addressing this question after a comprehensive review of scientific data and statistics and after a thorough airing of the competing interests and policies involved. Since we conclude that the state legislature has not addressed the duty owed in the context of an outpatient client, we follow the Supreme Court precedent of Petersen v. State, 100 Wash.2d 421, 671 P.2d 230 (1983). We rule that a question of fact exists as to whether Dr. Howard Ashby and his employer, Spokane Psychiatric Clinic, P.S., owed a duty to protect the general public, including plaintiffs, from violent behavior of patient Jan DeMeerleer.
¶ 2 During the early morning of July 18, 2010, Jan DeMeerleer entered the home of his former girl friend, Rebecca Schiering, and killed her and her son Phillip. He attempted to kill another son, Brian, but left Phillip's twin, Jack, alive. Afterward, DeMeerleer killed himself. Prior to the killings, Jan DeMeerleer received outpatient treatment for his depression and bipolar disorder from psychiatrist Dr. Howard Ashby.
¶ 3 Brian Winkler, individually, and Beverly Volk, as guardian ad litem for Jack Schiering, and as personal representative for the estates of Rebecca Schiering and Phillip Schiering (collectively Schierings) brought suit against Dr. Howard Ashby and the clinic that he worked, Spokane Psychiatric Clinic, P.S., for professional malpractice, loss of chance, and negligence. The trial court dismissed the Schierings' action on summary judgment because Jan never threatened the Schierings in his sessions with Dr. Ashby.
¶ 4 To the extent the Schierings argue Dr. Howard Ashby should have involuntarily committed Jan DeMeerleer, we affirm the trial court's dismissal. We also affirm dismissal of the Schierings' lost chance claim and dismissal of the Schierings' claim of independent negligence against Spokane Psychiatric Clinic, P.S. But because a question of fact exists as to whether Dr. Howard Ashby owed a duty to protect the general public, including the Schierings, we reverse the dismissal of the claim against Howard Ashby for negligence in treating Jan DeMeerleer and the claim against Spokane Psychiatric Clinic, P.S. for vicarious liability and remand for further proceedings.
¶ 5 Since the Schierings claim Jan DeMeerleer's psychiatrist committed malpractice, we review DeMeerleer's psychiatric background. In response to the summary judgment motion, the Schierings provided the trial court with some of Dr. Howard Ashby's chart notes. We do not know if all notes were provided.
¶ 6 Jan DeMeerleer was born in 1971 and received his degree in mechanical engineering from Purdue University, where his bipolar disorder and depression first surfaced. He was hospitalized with suicidal thoughts and first diagnosed with the diseases during the summer of 1992. A mental health professional then placed DeMeerleer on Depakote, a medication that treats manic episodes resulting from bipolar disorder. DeMeerleer soon ceased taking the medication. He moved to the Midwest for education and jobs. He imbibed alcohol to treat his depression.
¶ 7 In 1996, DeMeerleer married Amy after living with her for three years. The two first met at a Moscow, Idaho high school where they graduated in 1989.
¶ 8 Jan DeMeerleer next sought treatment for his disorders in 1997, when he once again developed suicidal thoughts. A physician treated DeMeerleer on an outpatient basis and prescribed Depakote again. DeMeerleer ceased his sporadic use of the drug in 1998, because he disliked its side effects. The drug decreased his creativity. He was embarrassed for others to know he took antipsychotic drugs.
¶ 9 Jan and Amy DeMeerleer moved to Spokane in 2000, where their daughter was born that year. Amy, with the daughter, vacated the family home in 2003. The couple divorced in 2004 and agreed to share residential care of the daughter, exchanging her every four days.
¶ 10 Jan DeMeerleer sought psychiatric care from defendant Dr. Howard Ashby beginning September 13, 2001. His wife, Amy, attended Jan's first visit to Ashby. Dr. Howard Ashby obtained a history from his patient, Jan DeMeerleer. Ashby's 2001 intake notes contain the history recited above. The notes also read in part:
Clerk's Papers (CP) at 238–40. Cyclothymic personality disorder is a mild form of bipolar disorder, with meeker mood swings between depression and hypomanic.
¶ 11 Dr. James Knoll, the Schierings' expert, averred in a declaration that he reviewed the clinical records from Spokane Psychiatric Clinic, P.S. In turn, Knoll included information in his declaration concerning Jan DeMeerleer's treatment, not included in the chart notes provided to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Volk v. Demeerleer
...psychiatrists absent an actual threat to an identifiable victim. In a split decision, Division Three reversed the summary judgment in part, Volk v . DeMeerleer , 184 Wash.App. 389, 337 P.3d 372 (2014). The Court of Appeals reinstated Volk's medical negligence claim, holding Petersen was app......
-
Boyer v. Morimoto
...relevant standard of care through the presentation of expert testimony, unless a limited exception applies. Volk v. Demeerleer , 184 Wash. App. 389, 430-31, 337 P.3d 372 (2014), aff’d in part, rev’d in part , 187 Wash.2d 241, 386 P.3d 254 (2016). Kathie Boyer does not contend that a jury ma......
-
Driggs v. Howlett
...... the presentation of expert testimony, unless a limited. exception applies. Volk v. Demeerleer, 184 Wn.App. 389, 430-31, 337 P.3d 372 (2014), review granted, . 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). In turn, the trial judge must ......
-
Driggs v. Howlett
...the relevant standard of care through the presentation of expert testimony, unless a limited exception applies. Volk v. Demeerleer, 184 Wash.App. 389, 430–31, 337 P.3d 372 (2014), review granted, 183 Wash.2d 1007, 352 P.3d 188 (2015). In turn, the trial judge must make a preliminary finding......