Vollrath v. Collins, S00A0279.
Decision Date | 10 June 2000 |
Docket Number | No. S00A0279.,S00A0279. |
Citation | 272 Ga. 601,533 S.E.2d 57 |
Parties | VOLLRATH v. COLLINS et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Meadows, Ichter & Trigg, Michael J. Bowers, T. Joshua R. Archer, Merrick D. Bernstein, Atlanta, for appellant.
John P. Tucker, Jr., Blue Ridge, Hollberg & Weaver, George M. Weaver, Atlanta, Doss & Doss, Oliver H. Doss, Jr., Blue Ridge, for appellees.
In January of 1999, the three members of the Board of Commissioners of Fannin County unanimously voted to retain Lynn Doss in the position of county attorney. Cline Bowers, who is the former Chairman of the Board of Commissioners, subsequently asserted that he alone had the authority to employ and discharge the County Attorney, and he sought to dismiss Ms. Doss. Commissioners Randy Collins and Yvonne McNelley opposed this move, contending that they too had a vote in the selection and retention of the county's legal representative. Seeking judicial approval of his unilateral authority in the matter, Bowers brought suit for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief and issuance of a writ of mandamus. After conducting a hearing, the trial court denied the claims for mandamus and for an interlocutory injunction. Although Bowers filed this appeal, he subsequently left office, and Dr. Richard Vollrath succeeded him as Chairman of the Board of Commissioners.
1. The Commissioners have moved to dismiss this appeal, asserting that it became moot once Bowers left his post as chairman. Chairman Vollrath opposes the motion to dismiss, and he has filed a motion to substitute himself for Bowers as the appellant.
The issue in this case is not whether Bowers, as an individual, was authorized to serve as chairman of the Board of Commissioners. Compare Bruce v. Maxwell, 270 Ga. 883, 515 S.E.2d 149 (1999). The controversy relates to the actual chairmanship itself, rather than to any particular occupant thereof. The dispositive question is whether whoever serves as the chairman has the sole authority over the employment of the county attorney, and need not share that power with the other two commissioners. Thus, this appeal is not rendered moot by the departure of Bowers from his position. See Collins v. Lombard Corp., 270 Ga. 120, 122(1), 508 S.E.2d 653 (1998). Chairman Vollrath has succeeded to the office formerly held by Bowers and, in that official capacity, he has determined that he will not withdraw the appeal, but wishes to pursue it. Therefore, Chairman Vollrath's motion to become the substituted appellant in this case is granted, and the Commissioners' motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
(Emphasis supplied.) Ga. L. 1975, pp. 2814, 2822, § 12. Clearly, this provision constitutes the general grant to Chairman Vollrath of sole authority to discharge Ms. Doss and to name her replacement, unless she is a county employee who is under the common supervision and control of all three of the elected commissioners. See Krieger v. Walton County Bd. of Commrs., supra at 682(4), 506 S.E.2d 366 ( ).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Croy v. Whitfield Cnty.
...officer of the county government, and the principal legal advisor to the governing authority. See generally Vollrath v. Collins , 272 Ga. 601, 602-603 (2), 533 S.E.2d 57 (2000) ("the county attorney serves as the legal representative and agent of the county" ); City of Atlanta v. Black , 26......
-
Schrenko v. DeKalb County School Dist.
...the General Assembly an intention to adopt a statute containing inconsistent or contradictory provisions. [Cit.]" Vollrath v. Collins, 272 Ga. 601, 604(2), 533 S.E.2d 57 (2000). Accordingly, I believe that the trial court correctly rejected that interpretation. With regard to the award of t......
-
Merry v. Williams
...we cannot conclude that the more general issue of the appropriate method for counting abstentions is moot. See Vollrath v. Collins, 272 Ga. 601(1), 533 S.E.2d 57 (2000). Accordingly, consistent with Defendants' position with respect to mootness, we hold that the claim for declaratory judgme......
- Tharpe v. Head
-
Local Government Law - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
...received state funds, the court explained, he was appointed by the chief judge of the county and not by the district attorney. Id. 193. 272 Ga. 601, 533 S.E.2d 57 (2000). 194. "The dispositive question is whether whoever serves as the chairman has the sole authority over the employment of t......