Von Viczay v. Thoms, 572A00.
| Decision Date | 04 May 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 572A00.,572A00. |
| Citation | 353 N.C. 445,545 S.E.2d 210 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Marika VON VICZAY v. Seline THOMS. |
John E. Tate, Jr., Hendersonville, for plaintiff-appellant.
Frank J. Contrivo and Rick S. Queen, Asheville, for defendant-appellee.
AFFIRMED.
Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
48 cases
-
Charlotte-Mecklenburg v. Dept. of Health
...15, 21, 567 S.E.2d 403, 408 (2002) (citing Von Viczay v. Thoms, 140 N.C.App. 737, 738, 538 S.E.2d 629, 630 (2000), aff'd 353 N.C. 445, 545 S.E.2d 210 (2001) (per curiam)). Summary judgment is appropriate if "the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, tog......
- State v. Call
-
Daniels v. Durham County Hosp. Corp., COA04-338.
...Von Viczay v. Thoms, 140 N.C.App. 737, 738, 538 S.E.2d 629, 630 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted), aff'd per curiam, 353 N.C. 445, 545 S.E.2d 210 (2001). The moving party has the burden of establishing the absence of any genuine issue of material fact and that it is entitled to judg......
-
Shelton v. Steelcase, Inc.
...denied, 353 N.C. 371, 547 S.E.2d 810, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 950, 122 S.Ct. 345, 151 L.Ed.2d 261 (2001)), aff'd per curiam, 353 N.C. 445, 545 S.E.2d 210 (2001). The evidence presented by the parties is viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Summey v. Barker, 357 N.C. 49......
Request a trial to view additional results