Voulgarelis v. State

Decision Date17 January 1995
Citation622 N.Y.S.2d 458,211 A.D.2d 675
PartiesAlexander VOULGARELIS, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Alexander Voulgarelis, appellant pro se.

Dennis C. Vacco, Atty. Gen., New York City (Peter G. Crary and Dennis Hurley, of counsel), for respondent.

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated June 25, 1993, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination granting the motion of the respondent State of New York to dismiss the claim as untimely filed.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Court of Claims correctly concluded that the claimant failed to timely file his claim with the court (see, Court of Claims Act § 10). Since the failure to comply with the statutory procedures for serving and filing a claim is a jurisdictional defect, the claim was properly dismissed (see, Dependable Trucking Co. v. New York State Thruway Auth., 41 A.D.2d 985, 986, 343 N.Y.S.2d 615; Byrne v. State of New York, 104 A.D.2d 782, 480 N.Y.S.2d 225).

BRACKEN, J.P., and BALLETTA, RITTER, PIZZUTO and FLORIO, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Welch v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 27, 2001
    ...Hosp. Med. Ctr., Cornell Univ., 259 A.D.2d 586, affd 94 N.Y.2d 524; Phillips v State of New York, 237 A.D.2d 590; Voulgarelis v State of New York, 211 A.D.2d 675). The claimant's alleged damages were ascertainable, and hence his claim accrued in November 1989 at the latest (see, Baskerville......
  • Crair v. Brookdale Hosp. Medical Center, Cornell University
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 15, 1999
    ...Parochial Bus Systems v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., supra, at 548, 470 N.Y.S.2d 564, 458 N.E.2d 1241; Voulgarelis v. State of New York, 211 A.D.2d 675, 622 N.Y.S.2d 458; Byrne v. State of New York, 104 A.D.2d 782, 784, 480 N.Y.S.2d 225). Similarly, the States of Virginia and Maryland r......
  • Zilm v. Koch
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 17, 1995

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT