Vulcan Freight Lines, Inc. v. South Carolina Ins. Co., Inc.
Decision Date | 21 May 1982 |
Citation | 446 So.2d 603 |
Parties | VULCAN FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. 81-189. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
John R. Frawley, Jr., Birmingham, for appellant.
W. Stancil Starnes and Randal H. Sellers, of Starnes & Atchison, Birmingham, for appellee.
This is an appeal by Vulcan Freight Lines, Inc., from a summary judgment: Vulcan claims the trial court erred in two aspects:
1) In its interpretation of certain coverage and exclusion provisions of a policy of liability insurance; and
2) In its failure to allow an alleged factual issue to be submitted for a jury determination.
A brief statement of the facts will suffice for the purposes of the issues presented.
Richard McKleroy was hauling freight for Vulcan from the U.S. Steel plant at Fairfield, Alabama, to the American Building Company at Eufaula, Alabama. The freight consisted of five 1,000-pound coils of painted steel. According to McKleroy's deposition, as he approached Union Springs, Alabama, while traveling at about fifteen miles an hour, he came to a sharp right curve in the road. While McKleroy was going around the curve, the coils on the trailer shifted, broke loose from the pallets to which they were attached, and rolled off the trailer. During all of this (again, according to his deposition), McKleroy's truck neither overturned nor collided with anything. The sole reason the coils came off of the trailer was the shifting of the load. After the coils were replaced on the trailer by means of a forklift, they were tied down with chains by McKleroy and he continued on his way to Eufaula.
A few miles south of Union Springs, for reasons unknown, one of the coils of steel came off the trailer again and rolled into the adjacent woods. It is without dispute, however, that the truck did not collide with anything and, on this occasion, it was almost dark. McKleroy could not obtain any help to reload this coil, so he continued on his way to Eufaula. At Eufaula, American Building Company refused to take possession of the cargo and refused to aid McKleroy in the recovery of the lost coil of steel.
On McKleroy's return trip to Birmingham with the remaining coils, he stopped at the site of the second accident and tried to find the lost coil, but was unable to do so. The coil of steel which rolled into the woods was not found during a search conducted by U.S. Steel. Apparently, the coil was stolen. Its whereabouts is still unknown.
Vulcan's claim against South Carolina Insurance Company is premised upon a policy of insurance containing the following pertinent provisions:
Notwithstanding Appellant's earnest insistence that we read some...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Welch v. Houston County Hosp. Bd.
...to interrogatories to be submitted in support of, or in opposition to, a summary judgment motion (see Vulcan Freight Lines v. South Carolina Ins. Co., 446 So.2d 603, 604-05 (Ala.1982)), that evidence must, nevertheless, conform to the requirements of Rule 56(e) and be admissible at trial. G......
-
Car Center, Inc. v. Home Indem. Co., Inc.
...to interrogatories to be submitted in support of, or in opposition to, a summary judgment motion (see Vulcan Freight Lines v. South Carolina Ins. Co., 446 So.2d 603, 604-05 (Ala.1981)), that evidence must nevertheless, conform to the requirements of Rule 56(e) and be admissible at trial. Gr......