W. B. Mershon & Co v. Morris
Decision Date | 25 May 1908 |
Citation | 148 N.C. 48,61 S.E. 647 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | W. B. MERSHON & CO. v. MORRIS. |
When a case is submitted on an agreed state of facts or on demurrer, no exception or assignment of error is necessary.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 2, Appeal and Error, §§ 1432-1434.]
Where the president of a corporation executed in its name an order for machinery on condition that the title should remain in the vendor until payment of price, and the corporation and its receiver, subsequently appointed, accepted and retained the property, such contract was enforceable, though no corporate seal was affixed thereto.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 12, Corporations, §§ 1801-1805.]
Appeal from Superior Court, Rutherford County; Justice, Judge.
Submission of controversy between W. B. Mershon & Co. and R. E. Morris, receiver of the Fry-Walker Lumber Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Parties plaintiff and defendant, having a question in difference which might properly become the subject of a civil action, and desiring to avoid the expense and delay of an action, have agreed upon the following case, which contains all the material facts upon which the controversy depends, and herewith submit the same, with the request that the court render such judgment as may be proper in the premises: It is agreed:
delivery of said machinery a paper writing was made, which is hereto attached and made a part and parcel of this agreement and marked 'Exhibit A':
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morris v. Y. & B. Corporation
... ... contracts; and this upon the sound doctrine that the defense ... of ultra vires will not avail when the contract itself has ... been in good faith fully performed by the other party, and ... the corporation has had the full benefit of the contract. 2 ... Beach, Priv. Corp. § 424." Mershon & Co. v. Morris, 148 ... N.C. 49, 61 S.E. 647; Gresham Mfg. Co. v. Buggy Co., ... 152 N.C. 633, 68 S.E. 175; Merchants' Nat. Bank v ... Oil Co., 157 N.C. 302, 73 S.E. 93 ... In ... Antietam Paper Co. v. Chronicle Pub. Co., 115 N. C., ... at page 145, 20 S.E. 366, the ... ...
-
Murchison Nat. Bank v. Dunn Oil Mills Co.
... ... [73 S.E. 95] ... of his possessing the power in the absence of anything ... indicating a want of it." In Mershon v. Morris, ... 148 N.C. 52, 61 S.E. 648, this court approves the following ... language from Judge Thompson (10 Cyc. 1003): "Excluding ... the ... ...
-
Warren v. Littleton Orange Crush Bottling Co., Inc.
... ... Fowle Memorial ... Hospital v. Nicholson, 189 N.C. 44, 126 S.E. 94 ... The ... corporate seal was not necessary. In Mershon & Co. v ... Morris, 148 N.C. 48, 61 S.E. 647, 648, the court, after ... saying that the ancient rule that a corporation could act ... only by its ... ...
-
Raleigh Banking & Trust Co. v. Safety Transit Lines, Inc.
...if indeed not wholly abrogated." In discussing the absence of a seal upon a title retaining contract for personal property in Mershon & Co. v. Morris, supra, court said: ""There was no necessity for the corporate seal. For the varied transactions of a business or manufacturing corporation i......