W. T. Grant Co. v. Phillips
Decision Date | 14 November 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 1,No. 43171,43171,1 |
Citation | 116 Ga.App. 650,158 S.E.2d 312 |
Parties | W. T. GRANT COMPANY v. Sallie M. PHILLIPS |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court
Where it appears on motion for summary judgment that plaintiff fell on steps that were well constructed, clean, and free of any foreign substance, had handrails down each side with another in the middle, were well lighted and had abrasive or safety tread inserts inlaid in them, and plaintiff made no claim of defect in the steps beyond an assertion that there was a 'slick spot' on them which caused her to fall, no negligence appeared on the part of the defendant and it was error to deny the motion.
Mrs. Sallie Mae Phillips seeks to recover damages of W. T. Grant Company for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained from a fall when she descended the steps of its store leading from the ground floor to the basement department of its store for the purpose of purchasing goods. She alleges that as she stepped from a landing (two steps above the basement floor) onto the first of the last two steps before reaching the basement floor she stepped 'upon a slick place on the step which was not apparent or visible to her and which she could not have reasonable (sic) foreseen,' whereupon her right foot slipped from under her, throwing her to the floor and bringing about an injury to her left knee, arm and shoulder. She also alleges that another lady had fallen at the same spot only a week earlier. Negligence is charged in the failure of the defendant to ascertain the condition of the steps and to remedy it so that it might safely be used in failing to provide immediate assistance to her and procure transportation for her to the hospital, thus aggravating her injury. General demurrers to the petition were overruled.
Plaintiff's deposition was taken by the defendant, in which she testified relative to her descent of the steps:
Depositions of Mrs. Vernedia Bozeman, assistant manager of the store, Mrs. Lillian Wheeler, a clerk in the store, Clara Clark, a clerk in the basement, and Elijah Clark, the janitor and cleaing man, were also obtained.
Mrs. Bozeman testified that she went to the basement right after the occurrence, saw Mrs. Phillips and learned that she had slipped on a step and fallen and that her shoe had come off when she fell. She looked at the steps where Mrs. Phillips had fallen and found them to be clean-rubbed her hand over the step and found nothing more than a little dust on it. The steps have a tread built into the tile that is darker than the rest of the step and is rougher so that one will not slip on it. Another woman, 74 years old, had fallen on the steps a week before, but that was because she missed a step-misstepped-not because of any defect in the steps or because of anything on them. She observed Mrs. Phillips' shoes, clothing, bundles, etc., for the purpose of making a report to the store management on it, and found that her shoes were 'awful run down and the heels were over in the back * * * and were very loose.' One of her shoes was off-it had come off when she fell. The steps are of regular width. The rough part of the tread is set in about two inches from the front.
Mrs. Wheeler testified that she was to the left of the steps when Mrs. Phillips fell-some 8 or 9 feet away, and that she immediately went to assist her. Mrs. Phillips was ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Food Fair, Inc. v. Mock
...evidence simply shows that the plaintiff fell while shopping in the defendant's store. This is insufficient. See W. T. Grant Co. v. Phillips, 116 Ga.App. 650, 158 S.E.2d 312. To hold the defendant responsible in damages under the evidence presented, would make the storekeeper an insurer of ......
-
Brown v. J. C. Penney Company, 45707
...S. H. Kress & Co., 114 Ga.App. 159(2), 150 S.E.2d 373; Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp., 116 Ga.App. 391, 157 S.E.2d 526; W. T. Grant Co. v. Phillips, 116 Ga.App. 650, 158 S.E.2d 312 and Martin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 120 Ga.App. 66, 67, 169 S.E.2d 718, and others of like Any other result would amo......
-
Hammonds v. Jackson
...Angel v. Varsity, Inc., 113 Ga.App. 507, 148 S.E.2d 451; Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp., 116 Ga.App. 391, 157 S.E.2d 526; W. T. Grant Co. v. Phillips, 116 Ga.App. 650, 158 S.E.2d 312. While summary judgment is generally inappropriate for negligence actions because a genuine issue of fact remains, ......
-
McGrew v. S. S. Kresge Co.
...evidence simply shows that the plaintiff fell while shopping in the defendant's store. This is insufficient. See W. T. Grant Co. v. Phillips, 116 Ga.App. 650, 158 S.E.2d 312. To hold the defendant responsible in damages under the evidence presented, would make the storekeeper an insurer of ......