W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Fortenberry

Decision Date09 March 1925
Docket Number24428
Citation103 So. 227,138 Miss. 410
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesW. T. RALEIGH CO. v. FORTENBERRY et al. [*]

APPEAL from circuit court of Neshoba county, HON. C. E. JOHNSON Special Judge.

Action by the W. T. Raleigh Company against H. L Fortenberry and others. Action was dismissed as to the named defendant before final judgment. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Reversed, and remanded.

Appellant the W. T. Raleigh Company, a corporation, sued appellees, H L. Fortenberry and others, in the circuit court of Neshoba county for the sum of two hundred seventy-nine dollars and twenty cents with interest. Appellee Fortenberry was sued as principal debtor, and the other appellees, E. S. Richardson W. D. Germany, and H. D. Bassett, were sued as his guarantors. Before final judgment, appellant dismissed as to appellee Fortenberry, who was a nonresident and had not been served with process, leaving the other appellees, his guarantors, alone as defendants. Appellees pleaded the statute of limitation of three years (section 3099, Code of 1906; section 2463, Hemingway's Code) as a defense, to which plea appellant demurred, which demurrer the trial court overruled, with leave to appellant to plead, which leave was declined, and thereupon final judgment was entered dismissing the cause at appellant's cost, from which judgment appellant prosecutes this appeal.

We believe a copy of the declaration in this cause, and of Exhibits A and B thereto attached, would probably be a fairly succinct statement of appellant's case. Leaving off the caption to the declaration and the signatures to the declaration and exhibits, they are as follows:

"Comes the W. T. Raleigh Company, a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the state of Illinois, in the county of Stephens, at the village of Freeport, and complains that H. L. Fortenberry was a nonresident at the time of filing this declaration, and has been since, and is now, and E. S. Richardson, W. D. Germany, and H. D. Bassett are resident citizens of Neshoba county, Miss., and for cause of action sets out facts as follows, to-wit: For that whereas, theretofore, to-wit, on the 13th day of August, 1915, a contract was entered into between the W. T. Raleigh Company, plaintiff, and H. L. Fortenberry, one of the defendants herein named, in which the plaintiff agreed to sell and deliver to the said H. L. Fortenberry goods, wares, and merchandise, and the said H. L. Fortenberry agreed to pay for the same, a copy of said contract being hereto attached and marked Exhibit A, asked to be made a part hereof just as if fully copied herein. And in consideration that the plaintiff, at the special instance and request of the said H. L. Fortenberry, would sell and deliver to H. L. Fortenberry on credit all such goods as the said H. L. Fortenberry should have occasion for and require of the plaintiff.

"Plaintiff further alleges that E. S. Richardson, W. D. Germany, and H. D. Bassett jointly and severally guaranteed unto the said W. T. Raleigh Company unconditionally the full and complete payment to said plaintiff of any and all indebtedness incurred under the terms of the agreement entered into between the said W. T. Raleigh Company and H. L. Fortenberry, and to all of the terms, provisions, and agreement contained in said instrument, they fully assented waiving acceptance of the contract of guaranty and notice of any nature whatsoever, and agreed that the written acknowledgment of the said H. L. Fortenberry of the amount due on his account or that any judgment duly rendered against him for the money due the company, should in every and all respects bind and be conclusive against them, a copy of said agreement being hereto attached and marked Exhibit B and asked to be made part hereof just as if fully copied herein.

"And the plaintiff, the W. T. Raleigh Company, confiding in the said promises of the defendants, H. L. Fortenberry, E. S. Richardson, and W. D. Germany, and H. D. Bassett, did afterwards, to-wit, on Angst 18, 1915, and on various other dates thereafter, sell and deliver to the said H. L. Fortenberry on credit six hundred eighty-two dollars and seventy cents worth of goods, and that the said plaintiff received on August 24, 1915, a remittance of twenty dollars and twenty-five cents, and on various other dates thereafter certain remittances aggregating the sum of four hundred three dollars and fifty cents which left a balance due April 1, 1916, of two hundred seventy-nine dollars and twenty cents, with interest from said date, all of which will more fully appear by reference to the sworn itemized account hereto attached and marked Exhibit C and asked to be made a part hereof just as if fully copied herein. The plaintiff further alleges that the said H. L. Fortenberry and his guarantors have often been requested to pay the said sum now due, but, having failed and refused, still fail and refuse to pay the same or any part thereof.

"The plaintiff therefore brings his suit for the sum of two hundred seventy-nine dollars and twenty cents with six per cent. interest per annum since April 1, 1916, on said sum, with cost to be taxed, and demands a judgment against the said defendants, H. L. Fortenberry, E. S. Richardson, W. D. Germany, and H. D. Bassett for the same."

Exhibit A--Contract.

"(1) This agreement made at the city of Freeport, in the state of Illinois, by and between the W. T. Raleigh Company, an Illinois corporation, party of the first part, hereinafter called the company and H. L. Fortenberry of Noxapater, Route 1, in the state of Mississippi, party of the second part hereinafter called the second party, witnesseth:

"(2) That for, and in consideration of the promises and agreement hereinafter contained to be kept and performed by the parties hereto, the company, unless prevented by strikes, fires, or other accidents caused beyond its control, agrees to sell and deliver to the second party, f. o. b. cars at Freeport, Ill or at its option at any other regular place of shipment, in such reasonable quantities only as the second party may, from time to time, desire to purchase all medicines, extracts, and other products manufactured or sold by it, such goods to be sold and delivered to the second party at the usual and customary wholesale prices, such prices to be shown by invoice of each shipment, and said second party agrees to purchase such goods on the above-prescribed terms and conditions, but the company may at any time suspend such sales and shipments, if said second party fails to make a payment as hereinafter provided, or for any other omissions or neglect by said second party.

"(3) The company will at its option also sell second party for cash or partly or wholly on credit a wagon, such as said second party may choose from current catalogues, circulars, or other descriptions and charge said wagon to his account at its customary cash or part cash and part credit price.

"(4) The company further agrees to purchase from said second party at any time during the term of or promptly after the termination or expiration of this contract and at the wholesale price then current such medicines, extracts, and other products of its manufacture (wagons excepted) as the second party may then have on hand and unsold, provided that these products are in as good and salable condition when received by the company as when purchased by said second party, and pay or credit second party therefor on the return of such products promptly by prepaid freight to Freeport, Ill., or such other shipping points as may be designated by the company in writing, and provided that said second party shall pay to the company its actual expense of receiving, inspecting, and overhauling all such goods.

"(5) The second party promises and agrees to pay to the company at its wholesale price f. o. b. cars at Freeport, Ill., or at any other regular place of shipment as aforesaid for all medicines, extracts, and other products sold to him from time to time including any balance due on wagon, as hereinbefore provided by ample cash weekly payments until this account shall be fully paid, and that upon determination of this contract at the option of either party hereto or by its expiration of limitations hereinafter provided said second party promises and agrees to pay in cash the balance due said company for all medicines, extracts, and other products and wagons sold and delivered to him as hereinbefore provided, but the time of making such payments or any or all of them may be extended by said company without notice to the guaranty of this agreement and without prejudice to any of the interest or rights of said company.

"(6) It is further understood and agreed that, if said second party shall pay his account in full, on or before the 15th day of each month, he will be allowed a discount of three per cent. from the usual and customary wholesale price.

"(7) And it is further agreed between the parties hereto that this contract is subject to acceptance at the home office of said company at Freeport (state of Illinois, and shall be construed as an Illinois contract), and unless previously terminated at the opinion of either party upon written notice shall expire by limitation on the 31st day of December, 1916.

"(8) At the expiration of this contract, by limitation the company agrees to make a new contract with said second party provided he secures guarantors acceptable to the company thereon, then will not require him to pay his account in full at that time, provided the amount of his purchase and the condition of his account are and have been satisfactory to the company; and, if such new contract is made by the parties hereto, said second party agrees to pay the company the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Rather v. Moore
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 19, 1937
    ... ... Central ... Trust Co. v. Meridian Light & Power Co., 64 So. 216; ... Dolan v. Tate, 161 Miss. 615, 137 So. 515; W. T ... Raleigh Co. v. Fortenberry, 133 Miss. 467, 97 So. 722 ... P. H ... Lowrey, of Marks, for appellants ... The ... court below held ... ...
  • Gulf & S. I. R. Co. v. Laurel Oil & Fertilizer Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 14, 1935
    ... ... v. First State Bank, ... 99 Miss. 610, 55 So. 408; Blodgett v. Pearl River County, 134 ... Miss. 816, 98 So. 227; Raleigh Co. v. Fortenberry, 138 Miss ... 410, 103 So. 227: Vicksburg Water Works Co. v. Y. & M. V. R ... R. Co., 102 Miss. 504, 59 So. 825; Keith v ... ...
  • Gulf & S. I. R. Co. v. Laurel Oil & Fertilizer Co
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • March 25, 1935
    ... ... v. First State Bank, 99 Miss ... 610, 55 So. 408; Blodgett v. Pearl River County, 134 ... Miss. 816, 98 So. 227; Raleigh Co. v. Fortenberry, ... 138 Miss. 410, 103 So. 227; Vicksburg Water Works Co. v ... Y. & M. V. R. R. Co., 102 Miss. 504, 59 So. 825; ... ...
  • Ransom v. Harroun
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 13, 1927
    ... ... 264, 115 Miss. 282; Hines v ... Potts, 56 Miss. 346; Standard Oil Co. v. Nat'l ... Surety Co., 107 So. 559, 143 Miss. 841; Raleigh Co ... v. Fortinberry, 97 So. 722, 133 Miss. 467; Y. & M ... V. R. R. Co. v. Kirk, 58 So. 710, 102 Miss. 41, and on ... suggestion of error ... Boyt, 54 Miss. 547; section 2482, ... Hemingway's Code; Yarbrouqh v. Gilland, 77 Miss ... 139, 24 So. 170; W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Fortenberry, 103 So ... Harroun's ... claim was one which could be proved by writing; that is, by ... the different notes of the firm which he ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT