Wade v. Wade
| Decision Date | 23 October 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D13–2354.,3D13–2354. |
| Citation | 123 So.3d 697 |
| Parties | S.L. WADE, Petitioner, v. D.T. WADE, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Lisa Marie Macci, Boca Raton, for petitioner.
Marks & West, Carolyn W. West and Evan R. Marks, Miami; Beermann, Pritikin Mirabelli Swerdlove and James B. Pritikin, Chicago, for respondent.
Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and EMAS, JJ.
Petitioner S.L. Wade (“the Mother”) seeks the issuance of a writ of prohibition following an order denying, as legally insufficient, an initial motion for disqualification of the trial judge. The standard of review of a trial court's determination on a motion to disqualify is de novo. MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332 (Fla.1990).
Having reviewed the petition and the response thereto, we conclude that the facts alleged in the motion to disqualify, which must be taken as true, 1 “would create in a reasonably prudent person a well-founded fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial.” Rodriguez, 919 So.2d at 1274.
As set forth in the sworn motion to disqualify, the trial judge held a hearing on the emergency motion of Respondent, D.T. Wade (“the Father”), seeking to suspend the Mother's timesharing. The Father presented, as his first witness, the parenting coordinator. During his testimony, the parenting coordinator began listing several “recommendations” which he believed should be implemented. The trial judge stopped the witness during his direct testimony and announced that the court was adopting one of these “recommendations.” The Mother objected to the court making such a determination without affording her an opportunity to cross-examine the Father's witness or to present her own evidence on the issue.
Further, at the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court on its own ordered that the mother undergo a psychological evaluation. The Mother objected and requested the opportunity to present testimony from her expert witness (a psychiatrist, who was present at the hearing) before the court ordered such an evaluation. The trial court denied this request.
By announcing its ruling, adopting one of the recommendations of the Father's witness before the Mother was afforded an opportunity to cross-examine the witness or present any evidence on the issue, and by ordering a psychological evaluation of the Mother, again without giving the Mother an opportunity to present evidence, the trial judge denied the Mother a most basic right of due process and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cini v. Cabezas
...182 So. 3d 776, 778 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ). We review a trial court order denying judicial disqualification de novo. Wade v. Wade, 123 So. 3d 697, 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)."The standard for viewing the legal sufficiency of a motion to disqualify is whether the facts alleged, which must be assu......
-
Great Am. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. 2000 Island Boulevard Condo. Ass'n, Inc.
...163.Petition granted.1 We review the trial court's order denying disqualification under a de novo standard of review. Wade v. Wade, 123 So.3d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).2 This “person” is Samuel Thomas, Great American's pre-litigation, engineering consultant. At issue in this hearing was, among......
-
Cini v. Cabezas
... ... 5th DCA 2015)). We review a trial court order denying ... judicial disqualification de novo. Wade v. Wade, 123 ... So.3d 697, 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ... "The ... standard for viewing the legal sufficiency of a ... ...
-
Marwan v. Sahmoud
...Standard of Review Whether a motion to disqualify is legally sufficient is a question we review de novo. See Wade v. Wade, 123 So. 3d 697, 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (citing MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So. 2d 1332, 1335 (Fla. 1990) ("The legal sufficiency of the motion is p......