Wagner v. Bank of Am., N.A.
Decision Date | 18 July 2014 |
Docket Number | No. 2D12–6131.,2D12–6131. |
Parties | Paul WAGNER, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., f/n/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Richard R. Kosan, Brandon, for Appellant.
Tricia J. Duthiers and J. Randolph Liebler of Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.
Paul Wagner appeals a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, the predecessor in interest to appellee Bank of America, N.A. (collectively referred to as the bank). We affirm the finding of liability in the final judgment without comment, but we reverse and remand for further proceedings on damages.
Wagner claims that the trial court erred in awarding $9588.85 for the costs of collection (including attorney's fees) when there was no evidence presented to support this amount. He also contends that the trial court erred in including $3619 for property inspections because there was no evidence to support this amount.
A damages award must be supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Shakespeare v. Prince, 129 So.3d 412, 413–14 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). The $3619 awarded to the bank for property inspections was not reflected on the payment history admitted at trial, which was the only evidence offered by the bank regarding the non-principal amounts owed by Wagner. The $9588.85 for costs of collection, which included costs paid by the bank's counsel and attorney's fees charged by the bank's counsel, were also not reflected on the payment history. The only evidence of these costs and fees was an affidavit filed by the bank's counsel prior to trial, but as all parties agreed below, Wagner was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the amount of attorney's fees and costs sought by the bank.1See Newman v. Newman, 121 So.3d 661, 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ( ). Therefore, there was no competent, substantial evidence to support the award of damages for the $9588.85 for costs of collection or the $3619 for property inspections.
Wagner also argues that the trial court's calculations for insurance damages exceeded the actual amount reflected on the payment history, and our review of the payment history...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mace v. M&T Bank
...the result of Doyle, which is consistent with my position here. The conclusion in Doyle is in line with both Wagner v. Bank of Am., N.A., 143 So. 3d 447 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), and Sas v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n, 112 So. 3d 778 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), both relied upon in Doyle, and it rests on......
-
Evans v. HSBC Bank, USA, Nat'l Ass'n
...evidence was erroneous. Consequently, HSBC Bank failed to present sufficient evidence as to its damages. See Wagner v. Bank of Am., N.A. , 143 So.3d 447, 448 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ("A damages award must be supported by competent, substantial evidence." (citing Shakespeare v. Prince , 129 So.3d......
-
S. Owners Ins. Co. v. Multiples
... ... See Union Am. Ins. Co. v. Haitian Refugee Ctr./Sant Refijie Ayisyin, Inc., 858 So.2d ... at 1054; see also Great Am. Bank ... ...
-
Michel v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 2D14–3022.
...findings” (quoting Diwakar v. Montecito Palm Beach Condo. Ass'n, 143 So.3d 958, 961 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) )); cf. Wagner v. Bank of Am., N.A., 143 So.3d 447, 448 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (remanding for an evidentiary hearing on attorney's fees when the bank had filed an affidavit of attorney's fees......
-
Chapter 13-4 Proof of Elements at Trial
...1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (calculation of accrued interest must be supported by admissible evidence).[77] Wagner v. Bank of America, N.A., 143 So. 3d 447, 448 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (damages award at trial was not supported by competent, substantial evidence where payment history did not reflect......
-
Chapter 13-4 Proof of Elements at Trial
...1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (calculation of accrued interest must be supported by admissible evidence).[75] Wagner v. Bank of America, N.A., 143 So. 3d 447, 448 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (damages award at trial was not supported by competent, substantial evidence where payment history did not reflect......