Wagner v. Binder
Decision Date | 01 July 1916 |
Docket Number | No. 17614.,17614. |
Citation | 187 S.W. 1128 |
Parties | WAGNER v. BINDER et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cole County; J. G. Slate, Judge.
Action by Lena Wagner against Frederick H. Binder, administrator, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
This suit was brought by the respondent against Frederick H. Binder, and others, to recover the sum of $9,352 damages sustained by her through the alleged fraud and deceit perpetrated by them upon her, in the sale by her of 167 shares of the capital stock of the Jefferson City Waterworks Company to Hugo Monnig. During the pendency of the suit said Binder died, and the suit, as to his estate, was revived in the name of his administrator. A trial was had before the court and jury, which resulted in a judgment for the respondent for the amount sued for. In due time and in proper form the appellants appealed the cause to this court.
The record is very voluminous, and the questions presented for determination are numerous; and the character of some of them, among others, that there is a departure between the pleadings and proof, and that the evidence did not establish the allegations of the petition, necessitate that those parts of the petition which charge the fraud and deception be set out, as well as the substance of the evidence pro and con, regarding such charges. But the statement of the case may be materially curtailed by first stating the undisputed facts; second, those parts of the petition charging fraud and deception; and, third, the substance of the respondent's evidence introduced regarding the controverted facts. Before doing that, however, it should be stated that the pleadings are unusually lengthy, and in order to shorten the statement of the case as much as possible, and still comply with the mandate of section 2088, R. S. 1909, I have adopted the above arrangement.
The undisputed facts are as follows:
The Jefferson City Waterworks Company (which will hereinafter be designated as the Water Company) was duly incorporated under the laws of this state in the year 1888, with its office and place of business at Jefferson City, and with a capital stock of $100,000, divided into 1,000 shares of the par value of $100 each. On June 27, 1908, the capital stock of the Water Company was duly increased from $100,000 to $135,000, in the manner, for the purpose, and with the limitations as stated in the following minutes of the records of the board of directors of the company, viz.:
As a matter of fact, this 350 shares of stock had never been issued, as I understand the record, but that is wholly immaterial; because, if issued, they were never sold, delivered, or transferred to any one, but remained in the hands of the treasurer of the company at all times.
The deceased, Frederick H. Binder, was the principal promoter of the Water Company and was the owner of 709 shares of the stock of the company. W. W. Wagner was the owner of 167 shares, W. J. Edwards and the Edwards estate owned 114 shares, and W. A. Dallmeyer and E. W. Cox owned 5 shares each, making a total of 1,000 shares. Some years prior to the matters complained of in this suit said W. W. Wagner departed this life, and through proper legal proceedings, the respondent, his widow, became the owner of his stock. For many years prior to his death, Frederick H. Binder had been a resident of Jefferson City, and had from the date of the incorporation of the Water Company been a member of its board of directors, as well as the president and general manager of the same. His son was the assistant manager.
Thomas & Co. were also old residents of Jefferson City, and for many years had been engaged in real estate, brokerage, and were general promoters of business deals. Prior to March 24, 1911, Thomas & Co. conceived the idea of negotiating a sale of the Water Company to some third party, not clearly identified at that time. On the last-mentioned date they procured from Binder a written authority to sell his stock, within 120 days, at the price of 80 cents on the dollar, less 5 per cent. commission for making the sale. On May 13, 1911, Thomas & Co. also procured from the respondent written authority to sell her stock within 70 days, at the price of 80 cents on the dollar, less 5 per cent. commission for making the sale. Said written authority was in the following words and figures, to wit:
The Binder authority mentioned was lost or destroyed by him before the trial, and was not introduced in evidence; but the uncontradicted evidence shows that it was exactly the same in language as the Wagner authority just copied, with the exception of the dates, amounts, name, and the last clause thereof, which was inserted at the suggestion of Wagner and Edwards. Dallmeyer executed a similar authority, except it authorized the sale of his 5 shares at 60 cents on the dollar, less 5 per cent. commission. No authority was obtained from Cox, nor was his stock sold. George W. Wagner was the son and duly constituted agent of the respondent, and as such represented her in all of the negotiations and transactions regarding the sale of her stock.
On May 25, 1911, all of the stock of the Water Company was sold to Monnig, for the sum of $136,000, with the exception of the five shares owned by Cox, the value of which was deducted from the purchase price. Four or five days prior to said sale to Monnig, Thomas & Co. surrendered to Binder the written authority he had given them to sell his stock for 80 cents on the dollar, less 5 per cent. for commission. The respondent and Edwards were paid $80 respectively for each share of their stock, the former amounting to $13,360 and the latter to $9,120, less 5 per cent. commissions for making the sale. Dallmeyer was paid 60 cents on the dollar for his 5 shares, amounting to $300, less 5 per cent. commission, and Binder sold his 709 shares at a fraction over $134 per share, amounting to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Goldsmith
... ... Co. v. Osterholm (Mo.), 136 S.W. (2d) 86; Graves v. Merchants & Mechanics Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (Mo.), 139 S.W. (2d) 1039, 235 Mo. App. 543; Wagner v. Binder, 187 S.W. 1128, l.c. 1155; McCutchan v. K.C. Life Ins. Co. (Mo. App.), 122 S.W. (2d) 59, l.c. 70; Winter v. Supreme Lodge, K.P., 69 S.W ... ...
-
Swon v. Huddleston
... ... See: Wagner v. Binder, Mo., 187 S.W. 1128; McCutchan v. Kansas City Life, Mo.App., 122 S.W.2d 59; Bone v. Friday, 180 Mo.App. 577, 167 S.W. 599; Wilden v ... ...
-
Freeman v. Berberich
... ... [Rauch v. Metz (Mo.), 212 S.W. 357; Wagner v. Binder (Mo.), 187 S.W. 1128; Weiermueller v. Scullin, 203 Mo. 466, 101 S.W. 1088; Signaigo v. Signaigo (Mo.), 205 S.W. 23; Allen Estate Assn. v ... ...
-
J.E. Blank, Inc., v. Lennox Land Co.
... ... (10) Adams' testimony competent. Sec. 1887, R.S. 1939; Wagner v. Binder, 187 S.W. 1128; Signaigo v. Signaigo, 205 S.W. 23; Rauch v. Metz, 212 S.W. 357; O'Neill v. Stratton, 64 Fed. (2d) 911; Maryland Cas. Co. v ... ...