Waite v. Summit Leasing & Capital Intern. Corp., 83-1661

Decision Date23 November 1983
Docket NumberNo. 83-1661,83-1661
Citation441 So.2d 185
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
PartiesBarry WAITE and Fox & Co., Appellants, v. SUMMIT LEASING & CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a corporation, and Wilbert Harold McCauley, Appellees.

Eric B. Meyers, P.A., Barbara E. Vicevich, P.A., and Maxine M. Long of Shutts & Bowen, Miami, and Parker, Chaplin, Flattau & Klimpl, New York City, of counsel, for appellants.

Peter J. Winders and James A. Gresser of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee, Summit.

BERANEK, Judge.

The defendants appeal a nonfinal order denying their motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens. We affirm.

The appellants are a multistate accounting firm and various partners. The firm's headquarters are in Denver, Colorado, yet it has an office in Broward County, Florida, and one of the firm's partners lives there. The only issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens.

A court may only consider application of the doctrine of forum non conveniens when both parties to the action are nonresidents of the state of Florida and the cause of action sued upon arose outside of Florida. Houston v. Caldwell, 359 So.2d 858 (Fla.1978). In this case, plaintiff was not a resident of Florida. However, the defendant partnership has a Florida office and a partner lives in the state. Therefore, the firm should be considered a resident of Florida, and the trial court did not err in denying defendants' motion. We decline to follow the appellants' urging that we depart from Houston v. Caldwell, supra.

AFFIRMED.

HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Forgach v. George Koch & Sons Co., Docket No. 95390
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • April 19, 1988
    ... ... Aquilina v General Motors Corp, 403 Mich 206 [267 N.W.2d 923] (1978). Stark, ... ...
  • Sibaja v. Dow Chemical Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • April 16, 1985
    ...v. Swain, 362 So.2d 17, 18 (Fla.1978); Houston v. Caldwell, 359 So.2d 858, 861 (Fla.1978); Waite v. Summit Leasing & Capital International Corp., 441 So.2d 185, 185 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1983); 3 therefore, the plaintiffs continued, the district court transgressed the Erie rule in dismissing the......
  • Continental Ins. Co. v. Kinney System, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 24, 1994
    ...courts based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens." 489 So.2d at 39 (emphasis added). See also Waite v. Summit Leasing & Capital Int'l Corp., 441 So.2d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (considering partnership with Denver headquarters as Florida resident for forum non conveniens purposes becaus......
  • National Aircraft Service, Inc. v. New York Airlines, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 5, 1986
    ...an out-of-state partnership with an office in Florida was not precluded from being sued in Florida. Waite v. Summit Leasing & Capital International Corp., 441 So.2d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Similarly, we hold that foreign corporations licensed to do business in Florida, with a place of busi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT