Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Harris, A98A1418.
| Decision Date | 16 September 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. A98A1418.,A98A1418. |
| Citation | 234 Ga. App. 401,506 S.E.2d 908 |
| Parties | WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al. v. HARRIS. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
McLain & Merritt, Jeffrey E. Hickcox, Alba M. Roman, Atlanta, for appellants.
C. Suzette Ellis-Hoyle, Decatur, for appellee.
We granted this discretionary appeal to determine whether an employer is responsible for temporary partial disability benefits where the employee refuses the employer's offer of full-time suitable work and instead accepts a part-time position with another employer.
Brenda Harris, who was hired as a stocking clerk by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in September 1996, was injured at work on December 12. After she was released for light-duty work, Wal-Mart made such work available to her. Harris returned to Wal-Mart on January 17, 1997, but left the job after two hours because of pain and discomfort. She never returned to work at Wal-Mart. On April 14 she accepted a part-time, light-duty position as a sitter for an elderly woman.
Harris sought temporary total disability benefits for the time she was out of work until she began the sitter job plus temporary partial benefits thereafter. Following an all issues hearing, the ALJ awarded Harris temporary total disability benefits from the date of injury until the date of return to Wal-Mart. The ALJ found Harris to be capable of performing light-duty work, and that Wal-Mart has continued to offer her such work since January 17, 1997. The ALJ found Harris's refusal of suitable light-duty work to be unjustified and denied any benefits from the day of short-lived work resumption until the day Harris accepted the sitter job. Up to this point the findings are not in dispute in this appeal. The rub comes because temporary partial disability benefits from the latter date were awarded and continue, due to Harris's reduction in earnings in the part-time sitter job.
The appellate division upheld the award but also assessed a 15 percent penalty on the accrued temporary total disability benefits and the temporary partial disability benefits through the date of the ALJ's award. The superior court affirmed the award based on the any evidence rule.
OCGA § 34-9-240(a) provides that "[i]f an injured employee refuses employment procured for him or her and suitable to his or her capacity, such employee shall not be entitled to any compensation at any time during the continuance of such refusal unless in the opinion of the board such refusal was justified." An employee's unjustified refusal of suitable work does not forever bar compensation if the proffered work becomes unavailable, but the disqualification lasts the duration of the refusal.1
Wal-Mart contends that inasmuch as it offered suitable work to Harris when she became capable of it and has never withdrawn that offer, Harris's continued and unjustified rejection disqualifies her for any income benefits as of that date. Wal-Mart argues that it is inconsistent with the statutory intent of OCGA § 34-9-240(a) to allow...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- KDS Properties, Inc. v. Sims
-
WAGA-TV, INC. v. Yang
...working status: "The employer is not liable for wage loss when there is no diminution of earning capacity." Wal-Mart Stores v. Harris, 234 Ga.App. 401, 402, 506 S.E.2d 908 (1998) (refusal of employment governed by OCGA § 34-9-240(a)). According to the statutory scheme, the ability to earn—n......
-
City of Atlanta v. Arnold, A00A1056.
...by contract, receipt of a pension does not automatically foreclose the receipt of income benefits under the Act). 14. 234 Ga.App. 401, 402, 506 S.E.2d 908 (1998). 15. See id. 16. At the hearing, no evidence was offered to show that Arnold ever notified his immediate supervisor, Sergeant Rob......
-
Waga-Tv Inc. v. Yang
...working status: "The employer is not liable for wage loss when there is no diminution of earning capacity." Wal-Mart Stores v. Harris, 234 Ga. App. 401, 402 (506 SE2d 908) (1998) (refusal of employment governed by OCGA 34-9-240 (a).) According to the statutory scheme, the ability to earn --......
-
Workers' Compensation - H. Michael Bagley, Daniel C. Kniffen, Katherine D. Dixon, and Marion Handley Martin
...47, 505 S.E.2d at 828. 134. Id. at 47-48, 505 S.E.2d at 828. 135. Id. at 48, 505 S.E.2d at 828. 136. Id. 137. Id. 138. Id. 139. Id. 140. 234 Ga. App. 401, 506 S.E.2d 908 (1998). 141. Id. at 401-02, 506 S.E.2d at 909-10. 142. Id. 143. Id. at 402, 506 S.E.2d at 910. 144. Id., 506 S.E.2d at 90......