Walker v. Fairchild Industries, Inc., Civ. LV 81-540 RDF.
Decision Date | 01 December 1982 |
Docket Number | No. Civ. LV 81-540 RDF.,Civ. LV 81-540 RDF. |
Citation | 554 F. Supp. 650 |
Parties | Barbara Ann WALKER, individually, and John Scott Walker and Samantha Leigh Walker, minors, by Barbara Ann Walker, their Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiffs, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Nevada |
Gary Logan, Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiffs.
William S. Barker of Cromer, Barker, Michaelson, Gillock & Rawlings, Las Vegas, Nev., for defendant.
DECISION RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EARLY DETERMINATION OF THE ADMISSIBILITY INTO EVIDENCE OF USAF AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT
This lawsuit arises out of an air crash which occurred at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, on July 10, 1981. Plaintiffs' decedent, Capt. Samuel S. Walker, USAF, was killed while piloting a USAF A-10 series aircraft, SIN 75-0302, manufactured by defendant Fairchild Industries, Inc. The plaintiffs, Walker's widow and two minor children, are claiming that the aircraft and its component parts were dangerously defective and the said defects were the proximate cause of the death of plaintiffs' decedent. The defendant's main defense is pilot error.
Plaintiffs have moved for an early determination of the admissibility into evidence of a USAF Aircraft Accident Investigation Report. The defendant objects to the admissibility of portions of that report.
It is plaintiffs' contention that the subject report should be admitted into evidence at trial because it falls within the public records exception to the general hearsay rule. Rule 803(8) of the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) states:
"Public records and reports.—Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth (A) the activities of the office or agency, or (B) matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report, excluding, however, in criminal cases matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel, or (C) in civil actions and proceedings and against the Government in criminal cases, factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness."
A leading case in this area is Fraley v. Rockwell Intern. Corp., 470 F.Supp. 1264 (S.D.Ohio 1979). The case arose out of an airplane crash in which a Lt. R.M. Fraley, United States Navy, and a trainee were killed. The airplane was manufactured by Rockwell International Corporation. The United States Navy issued two reports on the crash. The first report discussed the general circumstances surrounding the crash and was prepared by the Judge Advocate General's Office. The second report was prepared by the Naval Rework Facility at Alameda, California, and contained conclusions about the cause of the crash which were developed from engineering analysis based upon the airplane wreckage. In Fraley, the Court gave the following excellent summary of the law in this area:
The Court held that the first report prepared by the Judge Advocate General's Office lacked trustworthiness due to the inexperience of the investigator and therefore denied its admission. As for the second report, the Court admitted it on the basis that the factual findings made by the author of the report were based on firsthand knowledge of statements made by witnesses who did have firsthand knowledge of the facts mentioned in the report. Supra at 1268.
In another case in which the same documents were examined, Sage v. Rockwell International Corp., 477 F.Supp. 1205, 1209-10 (D.N.H.1979) (the trainee), the Court also admitted the first report on the basis that the inexperience of the investigator went to the weight of the report, without denying the admissibility of the evidence. In Sage, the Court gave the following analysis of why these reports should usually be admitted:
However, it should be noted that the Court, in Sage, withheld a ruling until time of trial on the Aircraft Mishap Board Report, the same type of report that is the subject of this motion. Id. at 1210.
A few other problems with this area of the law should also be addressed. While the question of whether a hearing was held as part of the investigation is a factor listed in the determination of trustworthiness, it is not required if the investigation is a complete one and the report meets the other tests for trustworthiness. Baker v. Elcona Homes Corp., 588 F.2d 551 (6th Cir.1978). Another area of some dispute is whether evaluative opinions contained in a report are admissible into evidence as "factual findings" pursuant to Rule 803(8)(C). The prevailing view is that all evaluative conclusions are within the scope of Rule 803(8)(C). Baker v. Elcona Homes Corp., 588 F.2d 551 (6th Cir.1978); Melville v. American Home Assurance Corp., 584 F.2d 1306 (3rd Cir. 1978); Sage v. Rockwell International Corp., 477 F.Supp. 1205 (D.N.H.1979); contra, Smith v. Ithaca Corp., 612...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rainey v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
...to the one prepared by LCDR Morgan, under Rule 803(8)(C) have broadly interpreted "factual findings." See, e.g., Walker v. Fairchild Indus., 554 F.Supp. 650, 653 (D.Nev.1982); Sage v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 477 F.Supp. 1205, 1207-10 (D.N.H.1979); Schoenborn v. Boeing Co., 586 F.Supp. 711, 72......
-
California Ass'n of Bioanalysts v. Rank
...findings." See, e.g., Melville v. American Home Assurance Co., 584 F.2d 1306, 1315-1316 (3rd Cir.1978); Walker v. Fairchild Industries, Inc., 554 F.Supp. 650, 653 (D.Nev.1982); 4 Weinstein & Berger, supra, ¶ 803(8)03 at 803-204 to 803-206. Since there is no evidence suggesting that the repo......
-
Nachtsheim v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
...p 803(8) at 803-240 (quoting 5 Wigmore, Evidence Sec. 1635 at 526 (3d ed. 1940)) (footnote omitted); see also Walker v. Fairchild Indus., 554 F.Supp. 650, 652 (D.Nev.1982) (discussing personal knowledge requirement under Rule 803(8)(C)). Since Mr. Mock disavows any personal knowledge of the......
-
Kay Freeman v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
... ... McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. (1983), 2 Ohio 3d 193, ... 443 N.E.2d ... v ... Matsushita Electric Industries, Inc. (1980), 505 F.Supp ... 1125). These ... reports." Walker v. Fairchild Industries, Inc ... (D. Nev ... ...
-
Governmental documents
...of its author, whom the owner of the airplane did not attempt to qualify as an expert witness. In Walker v. Fairchild Industries , 554 F. Supp. 650 (D. Nev. 1982), an official United States Air Force Aircraft Accident Investigation Report was admitted in a wrongful death case, but certain “......
-
Photographs, slides, films and videos
...issue because they were so grainy and pixelated that it was unclear as to what they actually depicted. Walker v. Fairchild Industries , 554 F.Supp. 650 (D. Nev. 1982); Short v. Jones , 613 P.2d 452 (Okla. 1980). 72 Fahringer v. Rinehimer, 283 Pa.Super. 93, 423 A.2d 731 (1980); City of Louis......
-
Governmental Documents
...of its author, whom the owner of the airplane did not attempt to qualify as an expert witness. In Walker v. Fairchild Industries , 554 F. Supp. 650 (D. Nev. 1982), an official United States Air Force Aircraft Accident Investigation Report was admitted in a wrongful death case, but certain “......
-
Governmental Documents
...of its author, whom the owner of the airplane did not attempt to qualify as an expert witness. In Walker v. Fairchild Industries , 554 F. Supp. 650 (D. Nev. 1982), an official United States Air Force Aircraft Accident Investigation Report was admitted in a wrongful death case, but certain “......