Walker v. Graham, AR-247
| Decision Date | 04 October 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. AR-247,AR-247 |
| Citation | 438 So.2d 946 |
| Parties | Jeffrey Jerome WALKER, Appellant, v. Bob GRAHAM, L.L. Wainwright, R.L. Dugger, D.E. Watson, and T.L. Barton, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeal from an Order of Circuit Court, Bradford County; John J. crews, judge.
Jeffrey Jerome Walker, pro se, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Harry F. Chiles, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellees.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Looney v. State
...cert. denied, 442 U.S. 932, 99 S.Ct. 2866, 61 L.Ed.2d 301 (1979); Maddux v. Rose, 483 F.Supp. 661 (E.D.Tenn.1980); Walker v. Graham, 438 So.2d 946 (Fla.1983); Amek Bin Rilla v. Israel, 113 Wis.2d 514, 335 N.W.2d 384 (1983). The court stated in Cook v. Hanberry, "`Assuming arguendo that his ......
-
Taylor v. State, 5 Div. 847
...cert. denied, 442 U.S. 932, 99 S.Ct. 2866, 61 L.Ed.2d 301 (1979); Maddux v. Rose, 483 F.Supp. 661 (E.D.Tenn.1980); Walker v. Graham, 438 So.2d 946 (Fla.1983); Amek Bin Rilla v. Israel, 113 Wis.2d 514, 335 N.W.2d 384 (1983). The court stated in Cook v. Hanberry, supra: "Assuming arguendo tha......
- Morgan v. J.S.D. Enterprise, AR-288