Walker v. Lamb
| Citation | 259 A.2d 663 |
| Parties | Irvin Corbitt WALKER, Jr., Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Colonel Charles LAMB, Superintendent of State Police, State Highway Department, State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellee. |
| Decision Date | 05 November 1969 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Delaware |
Stephen B. Potter, of Sullivan, Potter & Roeberg, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellant.
Fletcher E. Campbell, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Wilmington, for defendant below, appellee.
This is an appeal from the dismissal by the Court of Chancery of an action for a mandatory injunction requiring the return to the appellant of photographs and record of fingerprints taken in a criminal prosecution.
We affirm on the opinion below. See 254 A.2d 265.
The appellant relies upon Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, 89 S.Ct. 1394, 22 L.Ed.2d 676 (1969) and Bynum v. United States, 104 App.D.C. 368, 262 F.2d 465 (1958). Neither of these authorities creates a cause of action such as the appellant seeks to invoke here.
Moreover, the issue is now academic because the appellant has been indicted and the State unquestionably may take the fingerprint record and photographs anew. Equity will not do a useless thing.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Loder v. Municipal Court
...F.Supp. 804; Beasley v. Glenn (Ariz.1974) 110 Ariz. 438, 520 P.2d 310; Walker v. Lamb (Del.Ch.1969) 254 A.2d 265, affd. per curiam (Del.1969) 259 A.2d 663; Spock v. District of Columbia (D.C.Mun.App.1971) 283 A.2d 14; Purdy v. Mulkey (Fla.App.1969) 228 So.2d 132; People v. Lewerenz (1963) 4......
-
Doe v. Commander, Wheaton Police Dept.
...(1966); Sterling v. City of Oakland, 208 Cal.App.2d 1, 24 Cal.Rptr. 696 (1962); Walker v. Lamb, 254 A.2d 265 (Del.Ch.1969), aff'd 259 A.2d 663 (Del.Supr.1969); Kolb v. O'Connor, 14 Ill.App.2d 81, 142 N.E.2d 818 (1957); Weisberg v. Police Dept. of Lynbrook, 46 Misc.2d 846, 260 N.Y.S.2d 554 (......
-
Penton Bus. Media Holdings, LLC v. Informa PLC
...useless thing,’ an injunction will ‘not be granted where it would be ineffective to achieve its desired result.’ (quoting Walker v. Lamb , 259 A.2d 663, 663 (Del. 1969) ; New Castle Cty. v. Peterson , 1987 WL 13099, at *3 (Del. Ch. June 30, 1987) ) ), aff'd , 105 A.3d 369 (Del. 2014) ; cf. ......
-
N. River Ins. Co. v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.
...success on the merits.”66 Second, the Vice Chancellor was correct that, generally, equity will not do a “useless thing.” For example, in Walker v. Lamb, this Court found that the Court of Chancery properly dismissed an action for a mandatory injunction where petitioner sought the return of ......