Walker v. McMahn
Decision Date | 07 May 1908 |
Docket Number | 15,015 |
Citation | 116 N.W. 528,81 Neb. 640 |
Parties | DANIEL G. WALKER, APPELLANT, v. D. B. MCMAHN ET AL., APPELLEES |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the district court for Lancaster county: LINCOLN FROST, JUDGE. Affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
J. J. Sullivan and A. M. Post, for appellant.
W. T. Thompson, Attorney General, Halleck F. Rose and H. C. Vail, contra.
FAWCETT, C. CALKINS and ROOT, CC., concur. REESE, J., not sitting.
This case was tried before the board and in the district court, and argued and submitted in this court, at the same time and upon the same record as Munk v. Frink, ante, p. 631, and is controlled by the law and evidence in that case; and, for the reasons there stated, we recommend that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.
It is true appellant acted as assistant only to Dr. Munk in performing the operations complained of, but the evidence shows such a concert of action between these two doctors in these and other cases of a similar nature, and such a ready and unquestioning participation by appellant herein with Dr. Munk in the performance of the two operations involved, that there is no escape from the conclusion that if one were guilty both were.
CALKINS and ROOT, CC., concur.
REESE, J., not sitting.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Green v. Blanchard
...and as to wholesale cost of supplies. 65 A. 263; 28 R. I. 3; 161 S.W. 1169; 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 958; 162 Id. 796; 157 Ky. 123; 116 N.W. 528; 119 17; 135 S.W. 631; 129 P. 1128; 180 S.W. 538; 154 P. 56; 158 Id. 982; 43 L. R. A. (N. S.) 911; 142 P. 505. The action of the board was done in good......
- Walker v. McMahan