Walker v. Norris
Decision Date | 14 December 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 6193.,6193. |
Parties | WALKER v. NORRIS. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Howell County; Will H. D. Green, Judge.
"Not to be published in State Reports."
Suit for mandatory injunction by Flora R. Walker against G. J. Norris. From a judgment dismissing the petition, and dissolving a temporary order of injunction, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
G. Purd Hays, of Ozark, for appellant.
Tom R. Moore, of Ozark, for respondent.
This is a suit in which appellant, the plaintiff, seeks a mandatory injunction requiring respondent, the defendant, to quit the possession of certain lands described in the petition and deliver same to him and to restrain respondent from committing waste and trespass thereon. The suit was originally instituted in the Circuit Court of Christian County and a temporary mandatory injunction granted. Thereafter, upon application for a change of venue the cause was sent to Howell County, where, upon a trial the injunction was denied and "the petition dismissed and the temporary order of injunction dissolved." Whereupon, plaintiff-appellant duly appealed from said order and judgment to this court.
The petition in part is as follows:
The answer, in part, is as follows: "Defendant for special plea, to said cause of action informs the court, that at the time this suit and action was filed there was pending between the identical parties a certain suit and action, involving the possession of the lands set forth in plaintiff's petition, for unlawful detainer, which had been decided, and a motion for new trial pending, that was undisposed of, when this suit and action was tried, but notwithstanding the same, while such was pending and undisposed of, and while a motion for new trial was pending the plaintiff herein sued out, this suit and action, without right in the premises, and under a temporary writ issued, in this cause dispossessed the defendant of said...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Hoban
... ... Brothers, 217 S.W. 581; Steele v. Allison, 73 ... S.W.2d 842; Mexico Refractories Co. v. Pignet's ... Estate, 161 S.W.2d 417; Walker v. Norris, 145 ... S.W.2d 972. (4) Under the Illinois law of landlord and tenant ... defendants became hold-over tenants for an additional term of ... ...
-
State ex rel. Office of Civilian Defense Salvage Committee, City of Carthage, Jasper County v. Horner
... ... law." Thomas v. City of Malden, 118 S.W.2d ... 1059, l. c. 1063; Quinn v. Schneider, 118 Mo.App ... 39; Hodson v. Walker et al., 170 Mo.App. 632, 94 ... S.W. 72; Schuster v. Myers, 148 Mo. 422, l. c. 429, ... 50 S.W. 103. "Failure affirmatively to plead facts ... "Injunction ... will not lie to prevent the doing of a legal wrong when the ... petitioners have an adequate legal remedy." Walker ... v. Norris, 145 S.W.2d 972; Thompson v. City of ... Malden, 118 S.W.2d 1064. The judgment must be based on ... and supported by and must follow the petition ... ...
-
Mexico Refractories Co. v. Roberts
...defendant (respondent) under claim of right and color of title. Smith v. Jameson, 93 Mo. 13; Eaton v. Milbourn, 135 S.W.2d 387; Walker v. Norris, 145 S.W.2d 972; Echelkamp v. Schrader, 45 Mo. 505; Mining & Milling Co. v. Moore et al., 130 Mo.App. 627; High on Injunctions (4 Ed.), sec. 732, ......
-
Harris v. Union Elec. Co., 70374
...It is for this reason that an injunction will not lie where the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law. Walker v. Norris, 145 S.W.2d 972, 973 (Mo.App.1940). The plaintiffs have already demonstrated there is an adequate remedy at law by obtaining damages in the federal court We hold that th......