Walker v. Phelps
Decision Date | 02 March 1932 |
Docket Number | No. 51.,51. |
Parties | WALKER et al. v. PHELPS et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Washington County; Grady, Judge.
Action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, Pub. Laws 1931, c. 102, by H. G. Walker and others against W. T. Phelps and another. From the declaratory judgment rendered, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
This action was begun on August 24, 1931, by a petition filed by the plaintiffs in the superior court of Washington county, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 102, Public Laws of North Carolina, Session 1931, known as the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act. The relief prayed for by the plaintiffs is a declaratory judgment determining their rights on the facts alleged in their petition.
In response to citations duly served on them, the defendants filed answers to the petition. No issue of fact was raised by said answers; only issues of law were raised by the pleadings.
It appeared from the pleadings that there was a controversy between the parties to the action with respect to the rights of the plain tiffs under a deed executed by the defendant Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank by which the said bank conveyed the land described therein to the plaintiffs. This deed is dated April 1, 1930. It was duly recorded in the office of the register of deeds of Washington county on July 24, 1930. The tract of land conveyed by this deed contains 600 acres, more or less, and is a part of the W. T. Alexander farm, which was owned by the defendant Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank. This farm contained 1, 200 acres more or less.
On January 27, 1930, the defendant Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank entered into a contract in writing with its co-defendant, W. T. Phelps, by which it agreed to sell and convey a part of said Alexander farm, containing 600 acres, more or less, to the said defendant, upon the terms and conditions set out in said contract. This contract was not recorded at the date of the deed from the said bank conveying to the plaintiffs the remaining part of said Alexander farm.
The W. T. Alexander farm lies between Lake Phelps and the Scuppernong river, in Washington county. It is drained from the lake to the river by the Mountain Canal. This canal traverses said farm, practically dividing it into two parts. Lateral ditches and drainways have been constructed by which water is carried from the farm into the canal, and thence into Scuppernong river. The canal and these ditches and drainways constitute a common drainage system for the Alexander farm.
The contract between the defendant Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank and its codefendant, W. T. Phelps, dated January 27, 1930, and not recorded at the date of the deed from the defendant bank to the plaintiffs, contains the following stipulations, with respect to the Mountain Canal:
The deed from the defendant Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank to the plaintiffs, dated April 1, 1930, and duly recorded on July 24, 1930, contains the following covenants and stipulations:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Reed v. Elmore
...incident to the right to the benefit.' Application of the rule is found in Raby v. Reeves, 112 N.C. 688, 16 S.E. 760; Walker v. Phelps, 202 N.C. 344, 162 S.E. 727. Cases are not wanting, however, on factual situations closely analogous to those we are here considering. In Coles v. Sims, dec......
-
Town of Boone v. State
...and afford relief from uncertainty and insecurity, with respect to rights, status, and other legal relations," Walker v. Phelps , 202 N.C. 344, 349, 162 S.E. 727, 729 (1932)."An action may not be maintained under the Declaratory Judgment Act ... unless the action involves a present actual c......
-
Town of Beech Mountain v. Genesis Wildlife Sanctuary, Inc.
...and administered." Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Roberts, 261 N.C. 285, 287, 134 S.E.2d 654, 657 (1964) (quoting Walker v. Phelps, 202 N.C. 344, 349, 162 S.E. 727, 729 (1932) ). It is well settled that "[t]he Superior Court has jurisdiction to render a declaratory judgment only when the plead......
-
Time Warner Entertainment Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. Town of Landis
...is uncertain and secure that which is insecure." Carolina Power & Light Co., 203 N.C. at 820, 167 S.E. at 61 (citing Walker v. Phelps, 202 N.C. 344, 162 S.E. 727 (1932)).[19] {51} Having first defined the Act's lower bounds of justiciable controversy in the 1930s and 1940s, the North Caroli......