Walker v. State
Decision Date | 01 December 1921 |
Docket Number | A-3956. |
Citation | 202 P. 799,20 Okla.Crim. 319 |
Parties | WALKER v. STATE. |
Court | United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma |
In a prosecution for murder, evidence reviewed and held sufficient to sustain a verdict convicting the defendant of murder, but insufficient under the facts and circumstances of the case to justify the death penalty, and the judgment and sentence of death is modified to imprisonment for life at hard labor.
Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff.
The Criminal Court of Appeals cannot reverse a conviction because not sustained by the evidence, unless there is no substantial evidence tending to show defendant's guilt, or the evidence so fails as to make a necessary inference that the jury acted from partiality, passion, or prejudice, and the court will not weigh the evidence but will consider it all to ascertain if the conviction is founded on substantial evidence.
If from all the facts and circumstances attending the killing the jury can reasonably and satisfactorily infer the existence of the premeditated design, or intention to kill, they will be warranted in so doing.
One who intentionally uses upon the body of another, at some vital part, a deadly weapon, will in the absence of qualifying facts be presumed to intend the death, which is the probable and ordinary consequence of such act.
Appeal from District Court, Pittsburg County; Harve L. Milton Judge.
Charley Walker was convicted of murder and sentenced to death, and he appeals. Modified and affirmed.
Evidence held sufficient to sustain a verdict of murder, but insufficient under the facts and circumstances to justify the death penalty, so that the judgment and sentence will be modified to imprisonment for life at hard labor.
J. W Crow, of McAlester, and Lewis Morris, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
S. P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., and W. C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction in the district court of Pittsburg county, rendered February 1, 1920, in pursuance of a verdict finding the defendant guilty of murder and assessing his punishment at death. The information in substance charged that in said county on or about the 30th day of July, 1920, the defendant, Charley Walker, did kill and murder one C. L. Harkins, by striking, stabbing, and cutting the said Harkins with a certain sharp instrument, the exact nature of which is unknown.
On the 3d day of January, 1921, the defendant was put upon his trial, which resulted in a disagreement of the jury, and a mistrial was ordered by the court. On the 26th day of January, the defendant was again put upon his trial. The jury returned their verdict on the 28th day of January, 1921, with the result above stated.
The errors assigned are as follows:
That the verdict is contrary to law, and to the evidence; that the punishment assessed by the verdict and judgment is excessive, and was prompted by prejudice and passion, and was unwarranted by the law and the evidence.
The evidence shows that C. L. Harkins, the deceased, and the defendant, Charley Walker, were both convicts. The killing occurred at the prison brick plant, which is located not far from the penitentiary.
The defendant, a negro, was screening sand. He went to the toolhouse and asked for and received a hammer. He then went into a stock car standing in the brickyard. The deceased came along a runway that passed through the car pushing a wheelbarrow, and the affray which resulted in his death started in the car.
W. C. Tidwell testified:
Cross-examined, he stated that he had served several terms in the penitentiary, one for highway robbery, one for horse stealing, two for burglary, one for bank robbery, and one for assault with intent to kill, and is now serving a term for manslaughter.
J. B. McCullough testified:
J. L. Williams testified:
Joe Jackson testified:
On cross-examination he stated that he had also served a term in the Kansas Penitentiary.
Wyatt Peavy testified ...
To continue reading
Request your trial