Walker v. State
Citation | 74 S.E. 1100,11 Ga.App. 251 |
Decision Date | 05 June 1912 |
Docket Number | 4,129. |
Parties | WALKER v. STATE. |
Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
74 S.E. 1100
11 Ga.App. 251
WALKER
v.
STATE.
No. 4,129.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
June 5, 1912
Syllabus by the Court.
While ample time to prepare for trial should be allowed to one accused of crime, it is the duty of a defendant, who has given bond for his appearance at a specified term of the city court, to employ counsel and take any other necessary steps essential to his defense in advance of the term of court at which he is bound to appear; and a motion for continuance by one who has waited until the case has sounded for trial to employ his counsel, although he was previously under bond to appear at the court, was properly overruled.
The testimony of a witness who saw certain packages in the hands of a common carrier, and their reception and delivery, is as competent and valuable to show the number of them, and the dates upon which they were received and delivered, as are the records of the common carrier.
The evidence authorized conviction. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Error from City Court of Springfield; J. H. Smith, Judge.
D. L. Walker was convicted of crime, and brings error. Affirmed.
C. T. Guyton, of Guyton, and R. F. C. Smith, of Eden, for plaintiff in error.
R. W. Sheppard, of Guyton, for the State.
RUSSELL, J.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Walker v. State, (No. 4,129.)
...74 S.E. 1100(11 Ga.App. 251)WALKER.v.STATE.(No. 4, 129.)Court of Appeals of Georgia.June 5, 1912.(Syllabus by the Court.) 1. Criminal Law (§ 590*)—Time for Trial —Continuance. While ample time to prepare for trial should be allowed to one accused of crime, it is the duty of a defendant, who......