Walker v. State
| Decision Date | 17 August 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-1832,92-1832 |
| Citation | 622 So.2d 630 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | 18 Fla. L. Week. D1822 Jim WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Walker was charged with the crimes of sexual battery by digital penetration of a two-year old child and lewd and lascivious assault upon that child. The alleged offenses arose from a single act which occurred on August 6, 1991. He was convicted of attempted sexual battery, as a lesser included offense, and lewd and lascivious assault as charged, sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty and fifteen years respectively, and now appeals.
First, we find that, although disputed, the evidence--primarily that of the then-eight-year-old brother of the victim who said he saw the defendant sitting beside the child with his finger in her "privates"--was more than sufficient to support the jury findings of guilt. See Wilson v. State, 622 So.2d 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Stone v. State, 547 So.2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). We also reject Walker's claim to a new trial because of a number of asserted errors in the admission of evidence and in the prosecutor's final argument. In almost every such instance, however, the defendant did not object or otherwise preserve the pertinent issue for consideration either by the trial court or on appeal. Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32 (Fla.1985); Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978). We conclude that the incidents, treated either individually or collectively, did not involve a violation of the defendant's right to a fundamentally fair trial so as to require a reversal even in the absence of appropriate objection below. Compare Gonzalez v. State, 588 So.2d 314, 316 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) ().
The judgment and sentence for lewd and lascivious assault, however, are vacated on the ground that, as held in State v. Hightower, 509 So.2d 1078 (Fla.1987), followed by State v. Colbert, 522 So.2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), approved, 569 So.2d 433 (Fla.1990), "a sexual battery charge and a lewd assault charge involving the same incident and acts with a child under sixteen are mutually exclusive." Colbert, 522 So.2d at 437.
Affirmed in part, vacated in...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Maynard v. Sec'y
...this testimony was sufficient to support both a finding of sexual battery and attempted sexual battery. SeeWalker v. State, 622 So. 2d 630, 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); State v. Stone, 677 So. 2d 982, 983-84 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). A jury instruction on attempt was thus proper and the jury's findin......
-
D.D.M. v. State, 95-156
...Chaplin v. State, 622 So.2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). Accord Fjord v. State, 634 So.2d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Walker v. State, 622 So.2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Edwards v. State, 613 So.2d 508 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Likewise, the crime of attempted sexual battery would be mutually exclusive o......
-
State v. Stone, s. 95-2253
...was sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt for sexual battery let alone attempted sexual battery. See generally Walker v. State, 622 So.2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). H.M. further testified that the defendant made her touch his front private part and did so on more than one occasion. H.M......
-
Roe v. State, 94-2159
...n. 4 (Fla.1987); Fjord v. State, 634 So.2d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Lewis v. State, 626 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Walker v. State, 622 So.2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Edwards v. State, 613 So.2d 508 (Fla. 5th DCA WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur. ...