Walker v. State, 92-3838

Decision Date18 June 1993
Docket NumberNo. 92-3838,92-3838
Citation619 So.2d 518
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. D1457 Henry H. WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard Parker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Henry H. Walker has appealed from his sentence imposed on remand in Walker v. State, 604 So.2d 913 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We affirm.

In March 1989, Walker pled guilty to two counts of lewd and lascivious acts on a child. He received concurrent terms of 15 years incarceration plus 5 years probation. Walker later moved to correct an illegal sentence, claiming that the total of the incarcerative and probationary terms of this split sentence exceeded the 15-year statutory maximum. The trial court granted the motion, and resentenced Walker to concurrent terms of 10 years incarceration plus 5 years probation, and 15 years incarceration. This court reversed and remanded for resentencing in that, as a result of the sentence, Walker would simultaneously be incarcerated and on probation.

On October 22, 1992, the trial court resentenced Walker to consecutive terms of 15 years incarceration, and 5 years probation. At sentencing, Walker sought an award of credit for time already served plus accumulated gain time. The court agreed that he was "entitled to gain time for any time served," and that it would be ordered. The written judgment reflected credit for jail time served prior to the original sentence, and for prison time already served, but did not mention gain time.

Walker argues that the court must award him credit for gain time accumulated during his still-ongoing incarceration. He relies on State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989), which held that, when a defendant is released early from the incarcerative portion of a split sentence, then violates the succeeding probation, he is entitled at sentencing to credit for the entire incarcerative period (actual time served plus gain time). Otherwise, the court effects a forfeiture of gain time, an executive function of the Department of Corrections. The state emphasizes Green 's holding that the award of gain time is a DOC function, but Walker counters that credit for previously-earned gain time has been denominated a judicial function, Cole v. State, 569 So.2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

The award of gain time is solely a function of the Department of Corrections. Green; Shelby v. State, 554 So.2d 24 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). In the Green line of cases, the defendants had completed the incarcerative portions of split sentences,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Moore v. Pearson
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 10, 2001
    ...of Corrections pursuant to chapter 944, Florida Statutes. See State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925, 927 (Fla.1989); Walker v. State, 619 So.2d 518, 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Where a sentencing court attempts to either bar or grant gain time awards, those portions of the sentencing order have been s......
  • Crosby v. Harvey
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 17, 2003
    ...authority rests within the exclusive province of the Department. See State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925, 927 (Fla.1989); Walker v. State, 619 So.2d 518, 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Where a sentencing court attempts to either bar or grant gain time awards, those portions of the sentencing order have......
  • Tribue v. State, 96-1507
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 23, 1996
    ...amount of gain time rests with the Department of Corrections. See Smith v. State, 659 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Walker v. State, 619 So.2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The burden falls upon the defendant to seek credit for this time pursuant to the appropriate administrative procedures. S......
  • Posey v. Kaplan, 95-0565
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 20, 1995
    ...consideration of this issue by the trial court. We have considered Green v. State, 636 So.2d 830 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), Walker v. State, 619 So.2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), and Harvey v. State, 616 So.2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), relied on by Respondent. However, we deem them inapposite as to th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT