Walker v. Stoddard Circuit Judge

Decision Date31 October 1860
Citation31 Mo. 123
PartiesWALKER v. STODDARD CIRCUIT JUDGE.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. A judge would not be required by the supreme court to sign as a bill of exceptions a document containing neither the testimony nor the motions made and overruled, but simply calling for their insertion therein.

Application for a Mandamus.

The facts in this case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

Tyrrell, for Walker.

SCOTT, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a petition to compel the judge of the circuit court of Stoddard county [to sign a bill of exceptions]. Without inquiring at this time in relation to the power of this court over the subject of the petition, it will be sufficient to observe that annexed to the petition for a mandamus is a copy of the bill of exceptions, which the judge was required to sign. The signing of such an instrument would avail the party nothing. Such a bill of exceptions would avail in this court no more than a piece of blank paper. Instead of setting out the evidence to be preserved in the bill of exceptions, there is this memorandum: “Here insert testimony.” Instead of setting out the motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, there is the following note: “Here insert motion.” It is obvious that nothing can be gained by signing such a bill of exceptions, as it is nothing more than a skeleton. Motion for a mandamus overruled.

The other judges concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • State ex rel. Priddy v. Gibson
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • March 16, 1905
    ......177 187 Mo. 536 THE STATE ex rel. PRIDDY et al. v. GIBSON, Judge Supreme Court of Missouri March 16, 1905 . .          . ...The action is. against the judge of the circuit court, though Judge Gibson. is personally named as the respondent. ... . .           In. Walker v. Stoddard, 31 Mo. 123, the neglect which. defeated the writ was a ......
  • State ex rel. Guinan v. Jarrott
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • June 22, 1904
    ... 81 S.W. 876 183 Mo. 204 THE STATE ex rel. GUINAN v. JARROTT, Judge Supreme Court of Missouri June 22, 1904 . .           Writ. ...and James. L. Donnell, wherein a judgment was rendered by the circuit. court of Johnson county whereof the respondent was and still. is judge. ... It would avail him nothing. [Walker v. Stoddard Circuit. Judge, 31 Mo. 123.]. . .          But ......
  • State v. Gibson
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • March 16, 1905
    ...to appeal. The Supreme Court refused to interfere with such exercise of discretion on appeal from a judgment denying the writ. In Walker v. Stoddard, 31 Mo. 123, the neglect which defeated the writ was a failure to prepare the bill of exceptions in proper form, and no question of time was i......
  • Riggins v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • June 18, 1921
    ......           Appeal. from the Ripley Circuit Court.--Hon. Almon Ing, Judge. . .          REVERSED. . . ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT