Walker v. Walker, 45509
Decision Date | 30 September 1970 |
Docket Number | No. 3,No. 45509,45509,3 |
Citation | 178 S.E.2d 46,122 Ga.App. 545 |
Parties | Geraldine M. WALKER v. Sanders WALKER |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Carl P. Savage, Jr., Montezuma, for appellant.
Jones, Cork, Miller & Benton, E. Bruce Benton, George T. Williams, Macon, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Plaintiff in an action against her husband for the wrongful death of her son appeals from the order dismissing the action.
1. The General Assembly of Georgia did not authorize an action under Code Ann. § 105-1307 by a wife against her husband for the wrongful death of her child. Chastain v. Chastain, 50 Ga.App. 241, 177 S.E. 828; Heyman v. Heyman, 19 Ga.App. 634, 92 S.E. 25; Bulloch v. Bulloch, 45 Ga.App. 1, 163 S.E. 708; Harrell v. Gardner, 115 Ga.App. 171, 154 S.E.2d 265, and Horton v. Brown, 117 Ga.App. 47, 159 S.E.2d 489, cert. den. 117 Ga.App. 879. While in Horton four judges of this court dissented to the holding that children could not sue their step-father for the wrongful death of their mother, all nine judges agreed that under Chastain and Harrell a wife cannot sue her husband under the wrongful death statutes. Horton, supra, 54, 55, 159 S.E.2d 489.
2. The appellant asks this Court to re-examine the holdings in Chastain and the above cases. It is true that 'stare decisis' is a matter of judicial policy rather than judicial power. In this regard the common law is not immutable, but flexible, and upon its own principles adaps itself to varying conditions. However, even those who regard 'stare decisis' with something less than enthusiasm recognize that the principle has even greater weight where the precedent relates to interpretation of a statute. Once the court interprets the statute, 'the interpretation * * * has become an integral part of the statute.' Gulf C. & S.F.R. Co. v. Moser, 275 U.S. 133, 136, 48 S.Ct. 49, 50, 72 L.Ed. 200; Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507, 514, 68 S.Ct. 665, 92 L.Ed. 840. This having been done, any subsequent 'reinterpretation' would be no different in effect from a judicial alteration of language that the General Assembly itself placed in the statute. The principle is 'particularly applicable where an amendment is presented to the legislature and * * * the statute is amended in other particulars.' 50 Am.Jur., Statutes 319, § 326. While the wrongful death acts have been amended numerous times in the thirty-eight years subsequent to the Chastain decision, the interpretation...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Eschen v. Roney, 47452
...properly to legislative change alone. See Gulf C. & S.F.R. Co. v. Moser, 275 U.S. 133, 48 S.Ct. 49, 72 L.Ed. 200; Walker v. Walker, 122 Ga.App. 545, 178 S.E.2d 46. family immunity questions arise for both personal injury (common law) and wrongful death (statutory). See Horton v. Brown, 117 ......
-
Garza v. Swift Transp. Co., Inc.
...interpretation of a statute." See Galloway v. Vanderpool, 205 Ariz. 252, 256, ¶ 16, 69 P.3d 23, 27 (2003) (quoting Walker v. Walker, 122 Ga.App. 545, 178 S.E.2d 46, 46 (1970)). We are not, however, "`prisoners of the past,' particularly when the language of the statute at issue `does not co......
-
Bickford v. Nolen
...involving the interpretation of a statute." Mitchell v. State, 239 Ga. 3, 6, 235 S.E.2d 509, 512 (1977); see also Walker v. Walker, 122 Ga.App. 545, 546, 178 S.E.2d 46 (1970). Unfortunately, "stare decisis" is often a mere facade to cover the court's preference for the rule under considerat......
-
Barnwell v. Cordle
...life, the immunity does not extend to the personal representative of a deceased parent or child. 135 A.2d at 71. 9 Walker v. Walker, 122 Ga.App. 545, 178 S.E.2d 46 (1970); Horton v. Brown, 117 Ga.App. 47, 159 S.E.2d 489, cert. den. 117 Ga.App. 879 (1967); Chastain v. Chastain, 10 Code § 3-5......
-
When Wrong Is Right: Stare Decisis in the Supreme Court of Georgia
...because of stare decisis, then no case would ever be overruled. Certainly, this is not a sound position."). [11] Walker v. Walker, 122 Ga. App. 545, 546, 178 S.E.2d 46, 46 (1970) (physical precedent only). [12] E.g., City of Atlanta v. First Presbyterian Church, 86 Ga. 730, 732-33, 13 S.E. ......