Walker v. Whitehead
Decision Date | 01 December 1872 |
Citation | 16 Wall. 314,83 U.S. 314,21 L.Ed. 357 |
Parties | WALKER v. WHITEHEAD |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
IN error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia.
Mr. P. Phillips, for the plaintiff in error; no opposing counsel.
Mr. Justice SWAYNE stated the case, and delivered the opinion of the court.
The case, as it appears in the record, is as follows: On the 1st of January, 1870, the plaintiff in error instituted this suit against the defendant in error upon a promissory note, made by the latter to the former, dated March 28th, 1864, for $7219.47, payable on the 19th of March then next ensuing. The defendant interposed two pleas:
1st. That after the maturity of the note he had tendered payment in Confederate treasury notes.
2d. That he was a loser by the result of the late war against the United States of one hundred negroes worth $50,000, and of Confederate securities of the value of $20,000; that he was a citizen of the Confederate States who waged and carried on that war, and that he pleads those losses as an offset to the demand of the plaintiff to the amount of the principal and interest of that demand.
When the case was called on the calendar the defendant moved the court to dismiss it, because the plaintiff had not filed an affidavit of the payment of the taxes upon the note as required by the act of the legislature of Georgia of the 13th of October, 1870. The plaintiff objected upon several grounds. The court overruled his objection, and dismissed the case. The plaintiff thereupon removed it to the Supreme Court of the State. That court affirmed the judgment of the court below.
The first and second sections of the act referred to are as follows:
The fourth section declares it to be a condition precedent to a recovery that 'the said debt has been regularly given in for taxes, and the taxes paid.'
The fifth section provides, in respect of judgments already rendered, that no levy or sale shall be made unless an affidavit be made that all taxes 'have been duly paid from the time of making said contract to the time of attaching the affidavit.'
The sixth section provides that in all cases of indebtedness of this class the defendant may offset 'any losses he may have suffered by, or in consequence of, the late war against the United States,' whether the said losses 'be from the destruction or depreciation of property.'
The seventh section declares that these damages shall not be considered as 'too remote or speculative, if it appear that they were fairly and legitimately produced, directly or indirectly, by said war or the results thereof.'
The ninth section provides that these losses by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morrison v. Guaranty Mortgage & Trust Co
... ... v. U.S. Glue Co., 187 U.S. 611; ... Sidway v. Harris, 66 Ark. 387; 13 Am. & Eng. Ann ... Cas. 515; Gun v. Barry, 21 L.Ed. 212; Walker v ... Whitehead, 21 L.Ed. 357; Johnson v. Fletcher, ... 54 Miss. 260; Cooper v. Ferguson, 28 L.Ed. 1137; ... Rock Island Plow v. Peterson, ... ...
-
Home Building Loan Ass v. Blaisdell
...by the Constitution against invasion.' Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy, 4 Wall. 535, 550, 552, 18 L.Ed. 403. See, also, Walker v. Whitehead, 16 Wall. 314, 317, 21 L.Ed. 357. But this broad language cannot be taken without qualification. Chief Justice Marshall pointed out the distinction betwe......
-
Langever v. Miller
...v. Kreuz, 36 Minn. 136, 30 N. W. 458, 460; Adams v. Spillyards, 187 Ark. 641, 61 S.W.(2d) 686, 86 A. L. R. 1493; Walker v. Whitehead, 16 Wall. 314, 317, 21 L. Ed. 357; Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How. 311, 11 L. Ed. 143; Edwards v. Kearzey, 96 U. S. 595, 600, 24 L. Ed. To this we may add, that sin......
-
Salt Creek Transp. Co. v. Public Service Commission
...to fix rates, Co. v. Nebraska, 41 L.R.A. 481; State v. Comm., 272 S.W. 971; Thompson Corporations (2nd ed.) Vol. 3, Sec. 2954; Walker v. Whitehead, 83 U.S. 314; Law v. R. R. Com., (Calif.) 195 P. 423. The state may require carriers to protect their patrons by insurance, Nashville Co. v. Ala......
-
Protecting Your Client's Right to Recover Attorney Fees/costs
...Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (1934); see also Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy, 71 U.S. 535 (1866); Walker v. Whitehead, 83 U.S. 314 (1872).21. Ex parte Farb, 178 Cal. 592, 594 (1918).22. Id.23. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §...