Wall v. Hawker Pottery Co.

Decision Date30 June 1921
Docket Number12416.
Citation108 S.E. 134,27 Ga.App. 255
PartiesWALL v. HAWKER POTTERY CO.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

The suit was upon an open count, and, as amended, was not subject to the demurrer interposed.

Assignments of error must be specific, whether contained in a bill of exceptions or in a petition for certiorari, and, when based upon a decision of the trial court, must specifically point out the reason why the decision is error. Civil Code 1910, §§ 5183 and 6139; Warren v. Oliver, 111 Ga. 808(1), 35 S.E. 673; Callaway v. Atlanta, 6 Ga.App. 354, 64 S.E. 1105.

(a) In the instant case the petition for certiorari complained that the trial court disallowed an amendment to the defendant's answer, but the assignment of error upon this ruling was merely that it "was error." This assignment of error was not sufficient in that it did not point out why the ruling excepted to was error. Palmer v. Ingram, 2 Ga.App. 200, 58 S.E. 362.

After the amendment to the defendant's answer had been disallowed, it was not error to reject evidence offered in support of the amendment.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Error from Superior Court, McDuffie County; H. C. Hammond, Judge.

Action by the Hawker Pottery Company against J. C. Wall. Judgment for plaintiff. Certiorari overruled by the superior court, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

B. J. Stevens, of Thomson, for plaintiff in error.

P. B. Johnson, of Thomson, for defendant in error.

BROYLES, C.J.

Judgment affirmed.

LUKE and BLOODWORTH, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT