Wall v. Wall

Decision Date08 February 1878
Citation124 Mass. 65
PartiesSarah E. Wall v. Caleb A. Wall
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Argued October 4, 1877

Worcester. Writ of entry, dated March 13, 1877, to recover a parcel of land in Worcester. Plea, nul disseisin. The case was submitted to this court upon an agreed statement of facts, which, so far as material to the point decided, was as follows:

The demandant was the owner of the demanded premises on May 1 1872. The assessors of Worcester for that year assessed upon said estate a tax of $ 33.06. The tax list for 1872 was duly committed to the collector of taxes for collection. The demandant having failed to pay the tax, the collector advertised the estate for sale as follows: "City Collector's Notice. The owners and occupants of the following described parcels of real estate, situated in the city and county of Worcester and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, are hereby notified that the taxes thereon severally assessed for the year 1872, according to the list submitted to me as collector of taxes for said city by the assessors of taxes, remain unpaid, and that said parcels of real estate, or such undivided portions thereof as may be necessary, will be offered for sale at public auction at my office, No. 6 City Hall in said Worcester, on Friday the 20th day of February, 1874, at 10 o'clock a. m., for the payment of said taxes, together with interest thereon at 7 per cent. per annum from and after the 1st day of November 1872, and the costs and charges thereon, unless the same shall be previously discharged, viz.: [Then followed several estates, including the one in question, described as follows:] Sarah Wall, estate on the east side of Main Street bounded north by land of F. Whipple, south by land of E. P. Drury, and now or formerly owned by said Wall, containing 15,105 square feet of land, be the same more or less. Assessed, $ 33.06. Worcester, Mass., Jan. 19, 1874.

"Wm. S. Barton, treasurer and collector."

The advertisement was published in a daily newspaper in Worcester on January 19, 20, 26, 29 and 30, and on February 2, 3, 4 and 10, 1874. The entire estate of the demandant was sold by the collector to a person who subsequently conveyed it to the tenant.

Judgment was to be entered for the demandant or tenant, as the court should determine.

Judgment for the demandant.

T. L. Nelson, for the demandant.

F. T. Blackmer, for the tenant.

Morton, J. Endicott & Lord, JJ., absent.

OPINION

Morton, J.

The tenant's title is derived from a sale and conveyance of the premises by the collector of taxes of the city of Worcester. The demandant makes several objections to the validity of this sale. We are satisfied that one of these objections must prevail.

The statute requires that the collector shall give notice of the time and place of sale of real estate taken for taxes, by an advertisement to be published in a newspaper of the county in which such estate lies, and that "the advertisement shall contain a substantially accurate description of the several rights, lots or divisions of the estate to be sold the amount of the tax assessed on each, the names of all owners known to the collector, and the taxes assessed on their...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Forster v. Forster
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 23, 1880
    ...after satisfying the taxes and charges, to pay the residue of the proceeds of the sale, if any, to the owner of the land. In Wall v. Wall, 124 Mass. 65, decided February 8, 1878, it was adjudged by this court that the collector had no authority to sell an undivided interest in the land, so ......
  • Curtiss v. Inhabitants of Sheffield
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 6, 1913
    ... ... meant the actual physical object, and not an undivided ... interest therein. Accordingly it was held in Wall v ... Wall, 124 Mass. 65, that the collector could not sell an ... undivided portion 'so as to constitute the purchaser a ... tenant in common ... ...
  • Commonwealth v. Allen
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1909
    ...only once in each week. Such advertisement has been a general practice. In many towns of the state no other might be possible. See Wall v. Wall, 124 Mass. 65. Other provisions statute for publication for one or more weeks seem plainly to indicate that once in each week is intended. See Rev.......
  • Sanford v. Sanford
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • September 6, 1883
    ... ...          The tax ... sale was invalid, because it was made upon a notice to sell ... the lands, or undivided portions of them. Wall ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT