Wall v. Wall
Decision Date | 08 February 1878 |
Citation | 124 Mass. 65 |
Parties | Sarah E. Wall v. Caleb A. Wall |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Argued October 4, 1877
Worcester. Writ of entry, dated March 13, 1877, to recover a parcel of land in Worcester. Plea, nul disseisin. The case was submitted to this court upon an agreed statement of facts, which, so far as material to the point decided, was as follows:
The demandant was the owner of the demanded premises on May 1 1872. The assessors of Worcester for that year assessed upon said estate a tax of $ 33.06. The tax list for 1872 was duly committed to the collector of taxes for collection. The demandant having failed to pay the tax, the collector advertised the estate for sale as follows:
"Wm. S. Barton, treasurer and collector."
The advertisement was published in a daily newspaper in Worcester on January 19, 20, 26, 29 and 30, and on February 2, 3, 4 and 10, 1874. The entire estate of the demandant was sold by the collector to a person who subsequently conveyed it to the tenant.
Judgment was to be entered for the demandant or tenant, as the court should determine.
Judgment for the demandant.
T. L. Nelson, for the demandant.
F. T. Blackmer, for the tenant.
The tenant's title is derived from a sale and conveyance of the premises by the collector of taxes of the city of Worcester. The demandant makes several objections to the validity of this sale. We are satisfied that one of these objections must prevail.
The statute requires that the collector shall give notice of the time and place of sale of real estate taken for taxes, by an advertisement to be published in a newspaper of the county in which such estate lies, and that "the advertisement shall contain a substantially accurate description of the several rights, lots or divisions of the estate to be sold the amount of the tax assessed on each, the names of all owners known to the collector, and the taxes assessed on their...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Forster v. Forster
...after satisfying the taxes and charges, to pay the residue of the proceeds of the sale, if any, to the owner of the land. In Wall v. Wall, 124 Mass. 65, decided February 8, 1878, it was adjudged by this court that the collector had no authority to sell an undivided interest in the land, so ......
-
Curtiss v. Inhabitants of Sheffield
... ... meant the actual physical object, and not an undivided ... interest therein. Accordingly it was held in Wall v ... Wall, 124 Mass. 65, that the collector could not sell an ... undivided portion 'so as to constitute the purchaser a ... tenant in common ... ...
-
Commonwealth v. Allen
...only once in each week. Such advertisement has been a general practice. In many towns of the state no other might be possible. See Wall v. Wall, 124 Mass. 65. Other provisions statute for publication for one or more weeks seem plainly to indicate that once in each week is intended. See Rev.......
-
Sanford v. Sanford
... ... The tax ... sale was invalid, because it was made upon a notice to sell ... the lands, or undivided portions of them. Wall ... ...