Wallace v. State

Decision Date05 March 1928
Docket Number26520
Citation149 Miss. 639,115 So. 778
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesWALLACE v. STATE. [*]

Division B

ARREST. Officer, on information, amounting to probable cause, that felony has been, or is being, committed, may go on premises without warrant to arrest; officer, legally going on premises without warrant to arrest for felony, may testify to finding still, though flight prevented arrest.

Where an officer has information, amounting to probable cause, that a felony has been committed, or is being committed, he may go upon the premises where the crime has been, or is being committed, without a warrant, and make an arrest, and if, in so doing, he finds a still in possession of the defendant, he may testify to such fact, although he was prevented, by the flight of the person sought to be arrested, from making arrest.

HON. C P. LONG, Judge.

APPEAL from circuit court of Itawamba county. HON. C. P. LONG Judge.

Ed Wallace was convicted of having possession of a still, and he appeals. Affirmed.

See, also, 149 Miss. 198, 115 So. 342.

Judgment affirmed.

I. L. Sheffield, for appellant, and James W. Cassedy, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, for the state.

OPINION

ETHRIDGE, P. J.

Ed Wallace was indicted and convicted for having in his possession a still, and, from said conviction, he appeals to this court.

The evidence introduced against the defendant was objected to on the ground that there was no search warrant served upon him, and that therefore the evidence obtained was unlawful.

It appears that a party who owned the timber growing upon the lands of Wallace was on said lands, looking after his timber interest, and came upon a still located thereon, and thereupon reported that fact to the deputy sheriff, who, in turn, reported it to the sheriff; that shortly thereafter the sheriff, the deputy sheriff, and this party went upon the lands in question for the purpose of making an arrest of the defendant, and found him at the still, in company with another, and they were operating it. About the time the officers and the private citizen appeared upon the scene, Wallace and his companion left the still, going in a pathway leading toward the home of Wallace. The sheriff, with his deputy and the private citizen, went around, and came upon Wallace and his companion en route to Wallace's home, threw a flash-light upon them, and attempted to arrest them, but they fled, and their arrest was averted that night.

Wallace was identified by the sheriff, the deputy, and the private citizen as being one of the parties at the still, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Byrd v. Board of Sup'rs of Jackson County
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 15, 1937
    ... ... public road (Const. 1890, section 170) ... 3 ... EMINENT DOMAIN ... Neither ... the state nor any of its political subdivisions is required ... to tender in actual cash just compensation for property taken ... or damaged in eminent ... ...
  • Millette v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 12, 1933
    ... ... lawfully on the premises and it was proper for him to make ... the arrest without a warrant ... Love v ... State, 142 Miss. 602, 107 So. 667; Monette v. Toney, ... 119 Miss. 846, 81 So. 593; Mapp v. State, 120 So ... 170; Duncan v. State, 119 So. 179; Wallace v ... State, 115 So. 778; Ingram v. State, 111 So. 362 ... A ... search of the accused, as well as his personal effects, may ... be made as an incident to a lawful arrest ... Toliver ... v. State, 133 Miss. 789, 98 So. 342; Bird v. State, ... 154 Miss. 493, 122 So. 539; ... ...
  • Branning v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 27, 1952
    ...was lawful cites three cases--Kennedy v. State, 139 Miss. 579, 104 So. 449; Love v. State, 142 Miss. 602, 107 So. 667, and Wallace v. State, 149 Miss. 639, 115 So. 778. Neither case supports the contention. In the first case Kennedy was convicted of distilling. Simmons, a private citizen, f......
  • Bird v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 3, 1929
    ...Comby v. State, 141 Miss. 56; Orick v. State, 105 So. 465; Tolliver v. State, 133 Miss. 789; Kennedy v. State, 139 Miss. 579; Wallace v. State, 115 So. 778; v. State, 130 Miss. 112, text 118; Watson v. State, 133 Miss. 796; and Rawls v. State, 120 So. 211. OPINION ETHRIDGE, P. J. At the reg......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT