Wallace v. State, 1D17–1595
Decision Date | 22 March 2018 |
Docket Number | No. 1D17–1595,1D17–1595 |
Parties | James Neil WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, David A. Henson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Appellant, James Neil Wallace, challenges his conviction for aggravated assault and raises two issues on appeal, only one of which merits discussion. Appellant argues, and we agree, that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We, therefore, reverse the conviction and remand.
The State charged Appellant with two counts of aggravated assault by threat with a deadly weapon, one of which involved a motor vehicle and one of which involved a cane. During the State's case, the victim testified that Appellant, his "biological father" whom he had not seen in twenty years, came to his residence notwithstanding an injunction prohibiting such. On direct examination, the victim testified, The victim acknowledged on cross-examination that Appellant did not swing the cane at him like someone would swing a baseball bat or a golf club. He testified, "Like, one side, one hand holding it [the cane] braced, and the other side forcing it in." He affirmatively responded when asked if Appellant pushed the cane toward him. After the State rested its case, defense counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the cane was not a deadly weapon and that it was not reasonable to conclude that the victim had a well-founded fear of Appellant. The prosecutor asserted in part that "being struck with a cane can certainly break someone's bones, or cause any other form of great bodily harm." The trial court denied Appellant's motion, along with his renewed motion made after the defense rested its case. The jury found Appellant not guilty of aggravated assault involving a motor vehicle, but guilty of the offense involving the cane. This appeal followed.
The question presented by a motion for judgment of acquittal is whether, in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence is legally adequate to support the charge. Perez v. State , 138 So.3d 1098, 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). If competent, substantial evidence is presented to support a conviction, an appellate court generally will not reverse the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal. Id. A trial court's ruling on such a motion is reviewed on appeal de novo. Id. In reviewing a trial court's ruling, an appellate court must consider the evidence and all reasonable inferences from the evidence in a light most favorable to the State. Id.
An assault is "an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent." § 784.011(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). Aggravated assault is "an assault [w]ith a deadly weapon without intent to kill." § 784.021(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). Whether an object is a deadly weapon is not to be determined upon its capability of producing death, but rather on its likelihood to produce death or great bodily injury. Rudin v. State , 182 So.3d 724, 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) ; see also D.B.B. v. State , 997 So.2d 484, 485 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ( ).
We agree with Appellan...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Riley v. State
...consider "the evidence and all reasonable inferences from the evidence in a light most favorable to the State." Wallace v. State , 240 So. 3d 872, 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). The concern on appeal is whether, "after all conflicts in the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom have bee......
-
King v. State
...when it is used in a way likely to produce death or great bodily harm. Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 8.4; see also Wallace v. State , 240 So. 3d 872, 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). While an instrument may not ordinarily be a deadly weapon, the context in which it is used can transform it into one......