Wallace v. Townsend
Citation | 43 Ohio St. 537,3 N.E. 601 |
Parties | WALLACE v. TOWNSEND. |
Decision Date | 17 November 1885 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Ohio |
Error to district court, Jefferson county.
The Cleveland, Tuscarawas Valley & Wheeling Railway Company brought its action in the court of common pleas of Jefferson county, upon the subscriptions set out in the findings of fact, which appear below, against William H. Wallace and Spalding K. Wallace, executors of Henry Wallace, deceased, for the recovery of the amount claimed to be due upon such subscriptions. The trial court, upon the request of each party, stated its findings of fact and conclusions of law separately, as follows:
‘That in the early part of the year 1877, the Cleveland, Tuscarawas Valley & Wheeling Railway Company, being a railroad company duly incorporated under the laws of the state of Ohio, owning and operating a railroad from the mouth of Black river, on Lake Erie, to Urichsville, in Tuscarawas county, and contemplating an extension of its road beyond Urichsville, proposed to make such extension, by way of the valley of Stillwater and the valley of Wheeling creek, to the Ohio river at Bridgeport, opposite the city of Wheeling, provided that subscriptions to the capital stock of said company would be made by persons residing along the line of such proposed extension, and in the neighborhood of the southern terminus thereof, aggregating the sum of $250,000. That citizens of Wheeling, knowing of such proposition, and being desirous to promote such extension, held a public meeting, and at such meeting appointed a committee to solicit subscriptions to the capital stock of said company. That Henry Wallace, the testator of the defendants, then in full life, was present at the meeting, and thereafter, at the solicitation of said committee, subscribed, in a book furnished by the committee, a paper writing, of which the following is a copy: -and delivered said book to said committee; such paper writing having been previously subscribed by divers other persons. And said Henry Wallace afterwards, at the solicitations of said committee, subscribed, in another book furnished by the committee, another paper writing, of which the following is a copy: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Beall v. Beall, 50
...S.W.2d 325 (1948); Jordan v. Dobbins, 122 Mass. 168 (1877); Tucker v. Rucker, 221 Miss. 580, 73 So.2d 269 (1954); Wallace v. Townsend, 43 Ohio St. 537, 3 N.E. 601 (1885); Helfenstein's Estate, 77 Pa. 328 (1875); National Eagle Bank v. Hunt, 16 R.I. 148, 13 A. 115 (1888); 1 Corbin, Contracts......
-
Hudson Real Estate Co. v. Tower
...before the formation of the corporation is a revocation of a subscription. Phipps v. Jones, 20 Pa.St. 260; Wallace v. Townsend, 43 Ohio St. 537, 3 N.E. 601;Pratt v. Trustees, 93 Ill. 475;Railway Co. v. Wilkerson, 83 Mo. 235. Insanity is also held to be a revocation in Beach v. Methodist Epi......
-
Thompkins v. Dinnie
... ... v. Cornell, 117 N.Y. 601, 6 L. R. A. 807, 23 N.E. 177; ... Bohn Mfg. Co. v. Lewis, 45 Minn. 164, 47 N.W. 652; ... Wallace v. Townsend, 43 Ohio St. 537, 54 Am. Rep ... 829, 3 N.E. 601 ... Revocation ... before the amount to be raised was subscribed ... ...
-
Lewis v. Motorists Ins. Cos.
...that an offer cannot be accepted after the death of the offeror because the death of the offeror revokes the offer. Wallace v. Townsend (1885), 43 Ohio St. 537, 3 N.E. 601; 17 Ohio Jurisprudence 3d (1980) 455-456, Contracts, Section 23; Restatement of the Law 2d, Contracts (1982) 137, Secti......