Wallach v. Joseph
Decision Date | 08 May 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 2,No. 51513,51513,2 |
Citation | 420 S.W.2d 289 |
Parties | Louis WALLACH, Mollie Wallach, his wife, Shirley Kash and Richard Wallach, Respondents, v. Jack JOSEPH and Harold Friedman, Appellants |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Stephen A. Boggiano, Boggiano & Hessel, St. Louis, for respondents.
David K. Breed, St. Louis, for appellants.
This is a suit in equity involving title to real estate located on Lucas and Hunt Road in St. Louis County, Missouri.
On January 16, 1961, plaintiffs Louis Wallach and Mollie Wallach signed a Receipt for Earnest Money, which acknowledged receipt of the sum of $7,100 from defendant Harold Friedman as earnest money and part payment on purchase of the real estate, 'which property is this day sold to Harold Friedman, his successors or assigns for the total sum of Sixty-nine Thousand and no/100 ($69,000.00) Dollars.' On March 9, 1961, plaintiffs Louis Wallach and Mollie Wallach signed a Warranty Deed naming defendant Jack Joseph as grantee. At the time these documents were executed, the real estate was incumbered by a first deed of trust and a second deed of trust. On November 20, 1962, Louis Wallach and Mollie Wallach conveyed by quitclaim deed to plaintiff Shirley Kash as straw party for plaintiff Richard Wallach. Shirley Kash is a sister of Louis and Richard Wallach.
Plaintiffs brought this suit against defendants to determine title, to reform or set aside the instruments dated January 16, 1961, and March 9, 1961, and to cancel defendants' asserted interests in the real estate. The trial court decreed Richard Wallach to be the owner in fee simple of the real estate and found defendants have no title or interest therein. The trial court in its decree gave defendant Harold Friedman credit for payments and improvements made by him, restoring the parties to their original positions. Defendants appealed to this Court.
The facts are complicated and we shall recite only those which bear on the issues raised on appeal. Prior to the transaction in question, title to the real estate was in Louis Wallach and Mollie Wallach. In January, 1961, Louis Wallach, who operated a salvage yard on the premises, found himself in financial trouble. He was in default on the first deed of trust. Friedman came to see Louis Wallach and they discussed a disposition of the real estate.
According to Louis Wallach, they entered into an oral agreement whereby Friedman was to pay $2,737.14 to avoid foreclosure on the first deed of trust, pay in full an indebtedness of $10,000 secured by the second deed of trust, and advance $10,000 for working capital. He testified that a corporation was to be formed to take title to the real estate, with each owning one-half of the capital stock.
According to Friedman, no such oral agreement existed. He testified that there was no agreement for the formation of a corporation to be equally owned by the parties, and that the transaction was an outright sale as evidenced by the Receipt for Earnest Money and Warranty Deed.
There is an irreconcilable conflict in the evidence as between Louis Wallach and Harold Friedman. Therefore, the testimony of William J. Becker, a practicing attorney in Clayton, Missouri, is important. His testimony on direct examination, in part, is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Leonardi v. Sherry
...643, 658 (Mo.1973); Willman v. Beheler, 499 S.W.2d 770, 778 (Mo.1973); Perry v. Perry, 484 S.W.2d 257, 259 (Mo.1972); Wallach v. Joseph, 420 S.W.2d 289, 296 (Mo.1967); Sebree v. Rosen, 374 S.W.2d 132, 138 (Mo.1964); Burnett v. Johnson, 349 S.W.2d 19, 22-23 (Mo.1961); Anison v. Rice, 282 S.W......
-
Brown v. Brown
...on the ground that he would be unjustly enriched if he were permitted to retain it, a constructive trust arises." See Wallach v. Joseph, 420 S.W.2d 289, 295 (Mo.1967); Lucas, 166 S.W.2d at 1057; Skidmore v. Back, 512 S.W.2d 223, 230-31 (Mo.App. S.D.1974). Accordingly, Missouri courts have l......
-
DuSesoi v. United Refining Co., Civ. A. No. 81-93 ERIE.
...of fact." Thieman v. Thieman, 218 S.W.2d 580, 585 (1949); Dillard v. Earnhart, 457 S.W.2d 666, 670 (Mo.1970); Wallach v. Joseph, 420 S.W.2d 289, 295 (Mo.1967). The Missouri Supreme Court has implicitly recognized that these two distinct lines of authority exist, see, Dillard v. Earnhart, 45......
-
Warren v. Paragon Technologies Group, Inc.
...River Steamboat Co., 554 S.W.2d 466, 469 (Mo.App.1977); Sanger v. Yellow Cab Co., Inc., 486 S.W.2d 477, 481 (Mo.1972); Wallach v. Joseph, 420 S.W.2d 289, 294 (Mo.1967); Lynch v. Webb City School District No. 92, 418 S.W.2d 608, 617 (Mo.App.1967); Bearden v. Countryside Casualty Company, 352......