Walraven v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank

Decision Date06 December 1899
Citation53 S.W. 1028
PartiesWALRAVEN v. FARMERS' & MERCHANTS' NAT. BANK et al.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

KEY, J.

Both parties claim under titles emanating from the state. Appellees' is the older title; and, if appellant is estopped from denying its validity, of course it must prevail against his junior title. In affirming the judgment, we approved the ruling of the trial court, in holding that the judgment of the district court of Tarrant county, rendered December 15, 1895, was conclusive, and precluded appellant from assailing appellees' title. Upon further consideration, we are convinced that we committed error in this respect, and that the ruling referred to cannot be sustained upon the record presented to this court. There is no statement of facts in the transcript, and the Tarrant county judgment is described in this manner in the judge's findings of fact: "(4) That on December 15, 1895, in the district court of Tarrant county, Texas, in the cause of John W. Trevathan versus A. N. Schuster et al., being a suit brought to foreclose a mortgage or trust deed on said land and other lands, made by A. N. Schuster and A. Schuster to secure a debt of A. N. Schuster, who claimed title under Smissen, and to which the defendant James Walraven was made a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • KIRBY LUMBER CORPORATION v. Williams
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 24, 1956
    ...S.W. 166; Linder v. Thomas, Tex.Civ.App., 228 S.W.2d 300; Hampshire v. Greeves, 104 Tex. 620, 143 S.W. 147; Walraven v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W. 1028, and Wood v. Franklin Life, 5 Cir., 17 F.2d 80, that the district judge was right in holding that defendants' t......
  • Murphy v. Benson
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 1922
    ...remembered that this was a foreclosure suit, in which it was not ordinarily proper to determine the question of title. Walraven v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 53 S. W. 1028, and authorities there cited. It is true that the court decreed a foreclosure of the liens upon the east one-half of section......
  • KIRBY LUMBER CORPORATION v. Williams
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas
    • September 30, 1954
    ...of Texas. 7 Faubion v. Rogers, 66 Tex. 472, 1 S.W. 166; Hinzie v. Kempner, 82 Tex. 617, 18 S.W. 659; Walraven v. Farmers' and Merchants' National Bank, Tex.Civ.App., 53 S.W. 1028; Linder v. Thomas, Tex. Civ.App., 228 S.W.2d 300 and Wood v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 17 F.2d 80. 8 Tram ......
  • Hampshire v. Greeves
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 31, 1910
    ...in support of the proposition, Faubion v. Rogers, 66 Tex. 472, 1 S. W. 166, Hinzie v. Kempner, 82 Tex. 617, 18 S. W. 659, and Walraven v. Bank, 53 S. W. 1028. The rule to be deduced from these cases, and which is well settled, is that, in a suit to foreclose a lien, a subsequent purchaser o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT