Walsh v. Kelly

Decision Date16 December 2010
PartiesIn re Gary WALSH, Petitioner, v. Raymond KELLY, etc., et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
912 N.Y.S.2d 406
79 A.D.3d 552


In re Gary WALSH, Petitioner,
v.
Raymond KELLY, etc., et al., Respondents.


Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Dec. 16, 2010.

Cronin & Byczek, LLP, Lake Success (Dominick Revellino of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondents.

Determination of respondent New York City Civil Service Commission, dated May 23, 2008, which, after a hearing, affirmed the determination of respondent New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services to disqualify and terminate petitioner as a New York City police officer on the ground that he omitted and falsified pertinent facts about his background in his application for employment, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.], entered March 9, 2009), dismissed, without costs.

The hearing before the Civil Service Commission was not mandated by law and, therefore, the proceeding was improperly transferred to this Court (

Matter of Mingo v. Pirnie, 78 A.D.2d 984, 984-85, 433 N.Y.S.2d 886 [1980], affd. 55 N.Y.2d 1019, 449 N.Y.S.2d 478, 434 N.E.2d 714 [1982] ). Nevertheless, we decide the matter on the merits ( Matter of 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liq. Auth. of State of N.Y., 24 N.Y.2d 174, 180, 299 N.Y.S.2d 194, 247 N.E.2d 157 [1969]; Matter of DeMonico v. Kelly, 49 A.D.3d 265, 852 N.Y.S.2d 124 [2008] ).

The determination is rationally supported by testimony and documents adduced at the hearing showing that petitioner concealed that he had been a suspect in a criminal homicide while in the army and had associated with members of a gang that had committed a homicide. Furthermore, the Suffolk County Police Department had disqualified him from serving as a police officer ( see Mingo, 78 A.D.2d at 985, 433 N.Y.S.2d 886; Matter of Urciuoli v Department of Citywide Admin. Servs., 75 A.D.3d 427, 428, 905 N.Y.S.2d 65 [2010] ). No basis exists to disturb the Commission's credibility findings ( see Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443-444, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193 [1987] ). We have considered petitioner's other arguments and find them to be unavailing.

GONZALEZ, P.J., CATTERSON, ACOSTA, RICHTER, ABDUS-SALAAM, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT